Clean Architecture on Android: the Teamwork.com way!

The purpose of this repository is to showcase, with a very simple (but hopefully clear) sample Android project, how we implement Uncle Bob's Clean Architecture in our applications. This is not a working demo app: the only purpose of the classes in the project is to demonstrate how the dependency graphs work with the configuration explained below, and to illustrate which dependencies are typically involved in this type of architecture.

Given that broad nature of the topic and the amount of implementation details necessary to implement a working production project, we have simplified our example as much as possible and focused solely on the following areas:

• Module structure: each architecture layer has its own module, following closely the Clean principles and naming.
• Separation of layers: how to configure Gradle making use of api/implementation to hide unwanted dependencies
• Dependency Injection: how to set up Dagger 2 for a multi-module environment, but still ensuring the above points

Our requirements

There is no such thing as "the best architecture" when it comes to mobile applications: the best architecture approach for a project (or team) always depends on a series of factors and assumptions.

Our solution is based on specific requirements, and, although it might not be the silver bullet for every project, it works well and could help you define your own architecture or, at least, inspire you to think about it a bit more.

We came up with our solution (and we iteratively try to improve it) based on the following items:

• Software is our craft. We aim for our applications to be fast, as bug-free as possible and always suiting our customers' needs: the only way to achieve that is to ensure the quality and maintainability of our code through the use of best practices.
• We believe in code reusability. Modularising components is the only way to ensure that our code is reusable across products, maximise our bandwidth as a team and ensure that bug fixes are promptly delivered to all of our clients.
• Our applications are big. Most of our applications are complex, with non-trivial logic and a significant amount of screens and use cases: structuring our code in a formal and clear way is essential.
• Our applications should endure time. We don't like technical debt, and we don't like rewriting the same software, using the same technologies, only because that code is broken.
• We need to scale fast and make new developers onboarding smooth. Using a shared, well-defined architecture helps new developers in the team, who should then be able to get into the codebase faster and contribute to it from the get-go.

Modules

Listed below, a quick description of each module and a class diagram with their relationships.

Modules relationships

The following diagram illustrates the above mentioned modules relationships in this sample project. In order to support feature modules and (if properly configured) Instant Apps, the project's view/presentation layer is split into three modules; this is not a requirement and it can be avoided for small projects.

Modules description

Google Android Architecture Samples

Google has done a very good job at producing a set of code examples in their Android Architecture Blueprints repository. We took inspiration from it (especially from the todo-mvp-clean, todo-mvp-dagger and dagger-android branches), but found that the examples are quite simple and not suited for more complex applications. More specifically:

• It is well suited for small projects, but the "monolith module" approach doesn't scale well for medium/large applications
• The package-based separation of layers cannot be enforced at compile-time and is therefore very error-prone (especially when working in a big team)
• It is only a partial implementation of Clean: there is no real separation between presentation and business layer (presenters and use cases)
• It does not allow sharing code across applications, nor it is suitable for feature modules or Instant Apps

Dependency Injection

Our Gradle modules use Dagger (and its Android extension) for dependency injection. As an architectural choice to ensure encapsulation and enforce layer boundaries, the modules at lower layers do not have access at compile time to the higher layers except its closest dependency (see graph - i.e., the presentation layer can only access the business layer, not the data(-access) layer).

Any exception to this rule must be explicitly declared and made available through a provision method in a public component. Dagger doesn't work well with this kind of requirement out of the box when using Subcomponents, since it needs to have access at compile time to all of the implementation classes to build the dependency graph (which is what we want to avoid in the first place).

The sample project doesn't cover other useful Dagger features such scopes and "feature" components; however, both can be easily plugged into our core project structure.

Components relationships

The following diagram illustrates the dependencies between components in our sample project. Notice how all dependency/inheritance arrows point to the business layer. The entity layer does not need a component as it mainly comprises pure entity objects and business logic.

Goals

In order to allow using Dagger with our encapsulation constraints, we ensure that:

Each layer owns its Dagger component

Each Dagger Component is internal, and it is created and initialized within the module itself, so that each dependency graph is only fully visible inside the module. This guarantees encapsulation and allows us to declare both classes and the bound interfaces as internal if we don't want to provide access to them outside of the module. Modules and dependencies are, by default, only accessible by components in the same layer.

Each layer's Dagger component inherits a public plain interface

This interface only includes the dependencies that we want to expose outside of the module, e.g.:

interface BusinessComponent {
    // provision methods for dependencies exposed to the presentation layer
}

@Component
internal interface InternalBusinessComponent : BusinessComponent

interface DataAccessComponent { // in the `data-access` module
    // provision methods for data layer dependencies exposed to the business layer
}

@Component // in the `data` module
internal interface DataComponent : DataAccessComponent

By doing so, we also encapsulate the usage of Dagger within the module itself, without forcing external "client code" to use the framework, and simplifying injecting a mock of the whole component for testing when needed.

Dependencies between layers are fully managed by Dagger

Each layer which has a direct dependency to a component from another layer, will declare so in its Dagger component as a component dependency:

@Component(modules = [...], dependencies = [DataAccessComponent::class])
internal interface InternalBusinessComponent : BusinessComponent

Component Factory

Dagger has recently introduced component factories, which allow (sub)components to provide an interface, annotated with @Component.Factory (or @Subcomponent.Factory). The interface provides a single function, which contains dependencies (modules, components or any other) that the Component requires at dependency graph creation. We use component factories to pass the components which are dependencies in the layer we are initialising, along with other classes that might be passed on from lower level layers (e.g. the application Context) with @BindsInstance.

@Component(..., dependencies = [DataAccessComponent::class])
internal interface InternalBusinessComponent : BusinessComponent {

    @Component.Factory
    interface Factory {
        fun create(@BindsInstance applicationContext: Context,
                   dataAccessComponent: DataAccessComponent
        ): InternalBusinessComponent
    }
}

Initialization

Note: initialization code is ugly! The sample provides the simplest way to kick off the dependency graphs for each component and trigger initialization of dependencies that require it at application startup. Each project could require a different approach, the only requirement here is to follow the same layer initialisation order shown below.

The trigger for the initialization process is, as usual, the Application.onCreate() method. In order to provide layer-specific initialization on each module, the sample provides a SampleBusinessApplication abstract class in the business layer, and a SampleApplication class, usually in the application module. These classes provide callbacks to initialize the layers' components (in this order):

initializeDataComponent()
val businessComponent: BusinessComponent = initializeBusinessComponent()
initializeAppComponent(businessComponent) // the presentation/view layers need the business layer to be initialized

The data-bridge module

In order to fulfill the desired level of encapsulation dictated by Clean Architecture, the data layer is not directly accessible from other layers (and modules), and it is used by the business layer through the data-access layer. The data-bridge only purpose is to temporarily "break" the dependency inversion rule at initialization time to provide a DataBridgeInitializer; this is accessed by the application module to call to the data layer and trigger the Dagger dependency graph initialization for DataComponent.

Initialization steps

• data layer through the data-bridge module: DataBridgeInitializer calls to DataLayerInitializer, which executes the component factory's create() method for DataComponent and sets the singleton instance into DataComponent.INSTANCE and DataAccessComponent.INSTANCE (for access from the business layer)
• business layer: BusinessLayerInitializer, called by SampleBusinessApplication, which executes the component factory's create() method for BusinessInternalComponent and sets the singleton instance into BusinessInternalComponent.INSTANCE (DataAccessComponent.INSTANCE is passed to create())
• presentation/view layer: initializeAppComponent(businessComponent) is called, and the ApplicationComponent.create() factory method is executed Once all the Dagger dependency graphs are created, the application can then move on to the rest of its initialization process.

Dependency Injection: example

Note: this section is intentionally verbose and requires you to go through the code while reading. You can probably skip it if you are already familiar with Dagger.

We have three separate public Dagger Components in our codebase: ApplicationComponent (view/presentation layer), BusinessComponent and DataAccessComponent. These are declared in the corresponding layer's module to make sure that the Dagger annotation processor and compiler have access to all the required dependencies from the generated provider classes.

Let's take our Feature2DetailsPresenter example and follow its dependencies from the bottom-up in the architecture hierarchy:

Presentation layer

• When the default activity Feature2DetailsActivity is created, an injector method is called in the onCreate()
• An instance of Feature2DetailsPresenter must be created: the class has an @Inject constructor that Dagger uses to instantiate it
• Feature2DetailsInteractor is required by the constructor: we need to access the class provider, which is declared in BusinessComponent
• A named GLOBAL_COMPUTATION_EXECUTOR is also injected in the constructor. Note that this is provided by BusinessComponent but exposed all the way from DataAccessComponent (this kind of transitive dependency is sometimes useful)

Business layer

• BusinessComponent exposes Feature2DetailsInteractor via a provision method (feature2DetailsInteractor())
• Interactor bindings between interface and concrete implementation are declared in InteractorsBindingModule (Feature2DetailsInteractor binds to Feature2DetailsInteractorImpl)
• The bound implementation Feature2DetailsInteractorImpl has dependencies from the data access layer: Entity1Repo is one of those
• Feature2DetailsInteractorImpl also requires InternalInteractor, which is bound in InteractorsBindingModule, but not exposed in BusinessComponent (but available in InternalBusinessComponent)

Data (Access) layers

• The Dagger component DataComponent extends from the DataAccessComponent: all the provision methods for data access layer classes which are needed in the business layer are available here
• DataAccessComponent exposes the needed provision method: entity1Repo(): Entity1Repo
• SampleDataComponent includes DataRepoBindingModule, which, finally, contains the binding method which provides an instance of Entity1RepoImpl for the Entity1Repo interface

Other references

• Fabio Collini's excellent article Implementing Dependency Inversion using Dagger components
• Fabio Collini's presentation on SOLID and Clean Architecture on Android

License

Copyright 2018-2020 Teamwork.com

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at

    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.