balls

A unittest macro to save the world, or at least your Sunday.

Why?

There's a want to centralize and reuse the logic that determines what code is deemed successful and how we go about measuring this.

Goals

expect everything to work; any statement is a test
show the test code as we run it, unless not 😉
better stack traces and test source output
less magical syntax and less output omission
aim to run many cheap tests in fewer files
easily accumulate state between tests when desired
when attached to a tty, errors are not fatal
individual tests don't even have to compile
easier test reordering, built-in timing, mem stats
smaller, more self-evident testing macro
no options means, "what would disruptek do?"

FAQ

If you're wondering why you cannot see compiler error messages for a particular test that fails to compile, note that we use compiles() to swallow errors and allow subsequent tests to get executed, but only outside of --define:release.

With --define:release, compiler errors are fatal and output to console.
With --define:ballsDry, no color or emojis are output.
With --define:ballsNoDump, no symbol dumps will occur on test failure

Test Runner Usage

You can now run balls to run a limited local test matrix against the current compiler -- the matrix is expanded automatically on GitHub Actions CI. This runtime will try to guess how to test your project regardless of its structure, but you can help narrow what it chooses to compile by...

placing files matching t*.nim under a tests subdirectory, or
having a single file foo.nim in your foo project, or
simply letting balls test all the files in the current directory

The test runner is threaded and runs a comprehensive matrix which tries to safely reuse compilation assets.

You can add arguments which will be passed directly to the compiler:

$ balls --styleCheck:error
# ... all tests are compiled with --styleCheck:error ...

Test Library Usage

Here's a set of example tests which will pass (and fail) in interesting ways.

import balls

suite "suite balls":

  setup:
    discard "setup blocks work like you expect"

  block goats:
    ## this is a test of goats
    discard

  setup:
    discard "also, you can redefine them whenever"

  block pigs:
    ## a test of pigs
    discard

  teardown:
    discard "teardown works the same way, of course"

  var r = 3

  block sometimes_the_wolf_is_nice:
    assert true
    check true, "that wolf is very nice"
    inc r

  block sheepies:
    raise newException(ValueError, "you're terrible")

  block check_r:
    ## checking some things
    ## this block exists only to test inclusion of
    ## comments in the test code display...
    check r == 3
    echo r, " will not be output"

  block:
    ## check a list of statements in a block
    check "r should be 4":
      r < 5
      r > 3

  block:
    ## unnamed block
    discard

  block:
    discard "unnamed test"

  inc r
  assert r > 0
  ## this is a nice comment
  type TypesAreNotTests = bool
  ## there's really nothing else to say
  const VariablesDefinedOutsideBlocksAreNotTests = true

  test "a test: block is fine":
    discard

  block omission:
    skip()

  block:
    ## hide this gory when statement
    when defined(release):
      suite "fixed stuff":
        const compile = true
        proc doesnt(c: bool) =
          if not c:
            raise

        block:
          proc fixed() = doesnt(compile)
    else:
      suite "broken stuff":
        block:
          proc broken() = doesnt(compile)

  block assertions:
    assert 2 == 4 div 2
    assert 2 != 4 div 2

  block omitted:
    skip("i just don't wanna")

  assert "any statement is a test" != ""
  check r > 0, $r & " is a good test of dynamic messages"

  report "report for expression expansion:", r != 5
  checkpoint "but checkpoint behaves as it does in unittest: ", r == 5

  block explicit_failure:
    fail("this looks bad")

  block check_with_message:
    let x = 0
    check "".len < x, "empty strings are STILL too long"

  block great_expectations:
    expect ValueError:
      checkpoint "you love to see it"
      raise newException(ValueError, "awful")

  block unmet_expectations:
    expect ValueError:
      checkpoint "here comes trouble"

  block dashed_expectations:
    expect ValueError:
      check false, "the truth hurts, but not as much as the false"

Relax; your tests won't usually be this chaotic... Right? 😉

Here's a similar demo with --define:danger enabled to show the performance metrics; no failing tests are permitted in such a build.

Documentation

See the documentation for the balls module as generated directly from the source.

License

MIT

Cheap and reliable Node.js hosting starts at $3/month, and $1/month static HTML hosting

disruptek / balls

Programming Languages

Labels

Projects that are alternatives of or similar to balls