All Projects → sarulabs → dingo

sarulabs / dingo

Licence: MIT License
Generated dependency injection containers in go (golang)

Programming Languages

go
31211 projects - #10 most used programming language
shell
77523 projects

Projects that are alternatives of or similar to dingo

Di
psr/container implementation for humans
Stars: ✭ 69 (-8%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
Hiboot
hiboot is a high performance web and cli application framework with dependency injection support
Stars: ✭ 150 (+100%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
Bottlejs
A powerful dependency injection micro container for JavaScript applications
Stars: ✭ 1,171 (+1461.33%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
Di
Dependency injection container in go (golang)
Stars: ✭ 390 (+420%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
waiter
Dependency injection, Inversion of control container for rust with compile time binding.
Stars: ✭ 71 (-5.33%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
Mydi
moved to https://github.com/cekta/di
Stars: ✭ 21 (-72%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
Di
PSR-11 compatible DI container and injector
Stars: ✭ 141 (+88%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
Weaver
Dependency Injection framework for Swift (iOS/macOS/Linux)
Stars: ✭ 546 (+628%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, code-generation
Activej
ActiveJ is an alternative Java platform built from the ground up. ActiveJ redefines web, high load, and cloud programming in Java, featuring ultimate performance and scalability!
Stars: ✭ 183 (+144%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, code-generation
Tsyringe
Lightweight dependency injection container for JavaScript/TypeScript
Stars: ✭ 2,761 (+3581.33%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
Container Ioc
Inversion of Control container & Dependency Injection for Javascript and Node.js apps powered by Typescript.
Stars: ✭ 89 (+18.67%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
microcore
.NET Core framework for inter-service communication
Stars: ✭ 24 (-68%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
Container
A lightweight yet powerful IoC container for Go projects
Stars: ✭ 160 (+113.33%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
Container
🚀 PHP Service Container with fast and cachable dependency injection.
Stars: ✭ 28 (-62.67%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
Reflex
Minimal dependency injection framework for Unity
Stars: ✭ 263 (+250.67%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection, container
CreateAPI
Delightful code generator for OpenAPI specs
Stars: ✭ 176 (+134.67%)
Mutual labels:  code-generation
aspnet-mvc5-starter-template
Asp.Net MVC 5 Starter Kit is a S.O.L.I.D, clean and globalized template with all the necessary boilerplate, ready to go.
Stars: ✭ 39 (-48%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection
ultimate-kubernetes-bootcamp
Ultimate Kubernetes Bootcamp
Stars: ✭ 43 (-42.67%)
Mutual labels:  container
MVVM-Sample
Swift MVVM Sample project. Made with ReactiveCocoa, Swinject and Routers
Stars: ✭ 21 (-72%)
Mutual labels:  dependency-injection
kotlin-code-gen-sample
Code generation samples for Kotlin projects
Stars: ✭ 35 (-53.33%)
Mutual labels:  code-generation

DINGO

Generation of dependency injection containers for go programs (golang).

Dingo is a code generator. It generates dependency injection containers based on sarulabs/di.

It is better than sarulabs/di alone because:

  • Generated containers have typed methods to retrieve each object. You do not need to cast them before they can be used. That implies less runtime errors.
  • Definitions are easy to write. Some dependencies can be guessed, allowing shorter definitions.

The disadvantage is that the code must be generated. But this can be compensated by the use of a file watcher.

Table of contents

Build Status GoDoc codebeat badge goreport

Dependencies

This module depends on github.com/sarulabs/di/v2. You will need it to generate and use the dependency injection container.

Similarities with di

Dingo is very similar to sarulabs/di as it mainly a wrapper around it. This documentation mostly covers the differences between the two libraries. You probably should read the di documentation before going further.

Setup

Code structure

You will have to write the service definitions and register them in a Provider. The recommended structure to organize the code is the following:

- services/
    - provider/
        - provider.go
    - servicesA.go
    - servicesB.go

In the service files, you can write the service definitions:

// servicesA.go
package services

import (
    "github.com/sarulabs/dingo/v4"
)

var ServicesADefs = []dingo.Def{
    {
        Name: "definition-1",
        // ...
    },
    {
        Name: "definition-2",
        // ...
    },
}

In the provider file, the definitions are registered with the Load method.

// provider.go
package provider

import (
    "github.com/sarulabs/dingo/v4"
    services "YOUR_OWN_SERVICES_PACKAGE"
)

// Redefine your own provider by overriding the Load method of the dingo.BaseProvider.
type Provider struct {
    dingo.BaseProvider
}

func (p *Provider) Load() error {
    if err := p.AddDefSlice(services.ServicesADefs); err != nil {
        return err
    }
    if err := p.AddDefSlice(services.ServicesBDefs); err != nil {
        return err
    }
    return nil
}

An example of this can be found in the tests directory.

Generating the code

You will need to create your own command to generate the container. You can adapt the following code:

package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "os"

    "github.com/sarulabs/dingo/v4"
    provider "YOUR_OWN_PROVIDER_PACKAGE"
)

func main() {
    if len(os.Args) != 2 {
        fmt.Println("usage: go run main.go path/to/output/directory")
        os.Exit(1)
    }

    err := dingo.GenerateContainer((*provider.Provider)(nil), os.Args[1])
    if err != nil {
        fmt.Println(err.Error())
        os.Exit(1)
    }
}

Running the following command will generate the code in the path/to/generated/code directory:

go run main.go path/to/generated/code

Custom package name

If you want to customize the package name for the generated code you can use dingo.GenerateContainerWithCustomPkgName instead of dingo.GenerateContainer.

// The default package name is "dic", but you can replace it with the name of your choosing.
// Go files will be generated in os.Args[1]+"/dic/".
err := dingo.GenerateContainerWithCustomPkgName((*provider.Provider)(nil), os.Args[1], "dic")

Definitions

Name and scope

Dingo definitions are not that different from sarulabs/di definitions.

They have a name and a scope. For more information about scopes, refer to the documentation of sarulabs/di.

The default scopes are di.App, di.Request and di.SubRequest.

The Unshared field is also available (see sarulabs/di unshared objects).

Build based on a structure

Def.Build can be a pointer to a structure. It defines the type of the registered object.

type MyObject struct{}

dingo.Def{
    Name: "my-object",
    Build: (*MyObject)(nil),
}

You can use a nil pointer, like (*MyObject)(nil), but it is not mandatory. &MyObject{} is also valid.

If your object has fields that must be initialized when the object is created, you can configure them with Def.Params.

type OtherObject struct {
    FieldA *MyObject
    FieldB string
    FieldC int
}

dingo.Def{
    Name: "other-object",
    Build: (*OtherObject)(nil),
    Params: dingo.Params{
        "FieldA": dingo.Service("my-object"),
        "FieldB": "value",
    },
}

dingo.Params is a map[string]interface{}. The key is the name of the field. The value is the one that the associated field should take.

You can use dingo.Service to use another object registered in the container.

Some fields can be omitted like FieldC. In this case, the field will have the default value 0. But it may have a different behaviour. See the parameters section to understand why.

Build based on a function

Def.Build can also be a function. Using a pointer to a structure is a simple way to declare an object, but it lacks flexibility.

To declare my-object you could have written:

dingo.Def{
    Name: "my-object",
    Build: func() (*MyObject, error) {
        return &MyObject{}, nil
    },
}

It is similar to the Build function of sarulabs/di, but without the container as an input parameter, and with *MyObject instead of interface{} in the output.

To build the other-object definition, you need to use the my-object definition. This can be achieved with Def.Params:

dingo.Def{
    Name: "other-object",
    Build: func(myObject *MyObject) (*OtherObject, error) {
        return &OtherObject{
            FieldA: myObject,
            FieldB: "value",
        }, nil
    },
    Params: dingo.Params{
        "0": dingo.Service("my-object"),
    },
}

The build function can actually take as many input parameters as needed. In Def.Params you can define their values.

The key is the index of the input parameter.

To make things easier, there is the NewFuncParams that can generate the Params map without having to specify the keys:

dingo.Def{
    Name: "other-object",
    Build: func(myObject *MyObject, s string) (*OtherObject, error) {
        return &OtherObject{
            FieldA: myObject,
            FieldB: s,
        }, nil
    },
    // Same as dingo.Params{"0": dingo.Service("my-object"), "1": "value"}
    Params: dingo.NewFuncParams(
        dingo.Service("my-object"),
        "value"
    ),
}

Parameters

As explained before, the key of Def.Params is either the field name (for build structures) or the index of the input parameter (for build functions).

When an item is not defined in Def.Params, there are different situations:

  • If there is exactly one service of this type also defined in the container, its value is used.
  • If there is none, the default value for this type is used.
  • If there are more than one service with this type, the container can not be compiled. You have to specify the value for this parameter.

With these properties, it is possible to avoid writing some parameters. They will be automatically filled. This way you can have shorter definitions:

dingo.Def{
    Name: "other-object",
    Build: func(myObject *MyObject) (*OtherObject, error) {
        return &OtherObject{
            FieldA: myObject, // no need to write the associated parameter
            FieldB: "value",
        }, nil
    },
}

It works well for specific structures. But for basic types it can become a little bit risky. Thus it is better to only store pointers to structures in the container and avoid types like string or int.

It is possible to force the default value for a parameter, instead of using the associated object. You have to set the parameter with dingo.AutoFill(false):

dingo.Def{
    Name: "other-object",
    Build: (*OtherObject)(nil),
    Params: dingo.Params{
        // *MyObject is already defined in the container,
        // so you have to use Autofill(false) to avoid
        // using this instance.
        "FieldA": dingo.AutoFill(false),
    },
}

Close function

Close functions are identical to those of sarulabs/di. But they are typed. No need to cast the object anymore.

dingo.Def{
    Name: "my-object",
    Build: func() (*MyObject, error) {
        return &MyObject{}, nil
    },
    Close: func(obj *MyObject) error {
        // Close object.
        return nil
    }
}

Avoid automatic filling

Each definition in the container is a candidate to automatically fill another (if its parameters are not specified).

You can avoid that with Def.NotForAutoFill:

dingo.Def{
    Name: "my-object",
    Build: (*MyObject)(nil),
    NotForAutoFill: true,
}

This can be useful if you have more than one object of a given type, but one should be used by default to automatically fill the other definitions. Use Def.NotForAutoFill on the definition you do not want to use automatically.

Generated container

Basic container

The container is generated in the dic package inside the destination directory. The container is more or less similar to the one from sarulabs/di.

It implements this interface:

interface {
    Scope() string
    Scopes() []string
    ParentScopes() []string
    SubScopes() []string
    Parent() *Container
    SubContainer() (*Container, error)
    SafeGet(name string) (interface{}, error)
    Get(name string) interface{}
    Fill(name string, dst interface{}) error
    UnscopedSafeGet(name string) (interface{}, error)
    UnscopedGet(name string) interface{}
    UnscopedFill(name string, dst interface{}) error
    Clean() error
    DeleteWithSubContainers() error
    Delete() error
    IsClosed() bool
}

To create the container, there is the NewContainer function:

func NewContainer(scopes ...string) (*Container, error)

You need to specify the scopes. By default di.App, di.Request and di.SubRequest are used.

A NewBuilder function is also available. It allows you to redefine some services (Add and Set methods) before generating the container with its Build method. It is not recommended but can be useful for testing.

Additional methods

For each object, four other methods are generated. These methods are typed so it is probably the one you will want to use.

They match the SafeGet, Get, UnscopedSafeGet and UnscopedGet methods. They have the name of the definition as suffix.

For example for the my-object definition:

interface {
    SafeGetMyObject() (*MyObject, error)
    GetMyObject() *MyObject
    UnscopedSafeGetMyObject() (*MyObject, error)
    UnscopedGetMyObject() *MyObject
}

my-object has been converted to MyObject.

The name conversion follow these rules:

  • only letters and digits are kept
  • it starts with an uppercase character
  • after a character that is not a letter or a digit, there is another uppercase character

For example --apple--orange--2--PERRY-- would become AppleOrange2PERRY.

Note that you can not have a name beginning by a digit.

C function

There is also a C function in the dic package. Its role is to turn an interface into a *Container.

By default, the C function can:

  • cast a container into a *Container if it is possible
  • retrieve a *Container from the context of an *http.Request (the key being dingo.ContainerKey("dingo"))

This function can be redefined to fit your use case:

dic.C = func(i interface{}) *Container {
    // Find and return the container.
}

The C function is used in retrieval functions.

Retrieval functions

For each definition, another function is generated.

Its name is the formatted definition name. It takes an interface as input parameter, and returns the object.

For my-object, the generated function would be:

func MyObject(i interface{}) *MyObject {
    // ...
}

The generated function uses the C function to retrieve the container from the given interface. Then it builds the object.

It can be useful if you do not have the *Container but only an interface wrapping the container:

type MyContainer interface {
    // Only basic untyped methods.
    Get(string) interface{}
}

func (c MyContainer) {
    obj := c.Get("my-object").(*MyObject)

    // or

    obj := c.(*dic.Container).GetMyObject()

    // can be replaced by

    obj := dic.MyObject(c)
}

It can also be useful in an http handler. If you add a middleware to store the container in the request context with:

// Create a new request req, which is like request r but with the container in its context.
ctx := context.WithValue(r.Context(), dingo.ContainerKey("dingo"), container)
req := r.WithContext(ctx)

Then you can use it in the handler:

func (w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    // The function can find the container in r thanks to dic.C.
    // That is why it can create the object.
    obj := dic.MyObject(r)
}

Upgrade from v3

  • You need to register the definitions in a Provider. The dingo binary is also not available anymore as it would depends on the Provider now. So you have to write it yourself. See the Setup section.
  • dingo.App, dingo.Request and dingo.SubRequest have been removed. Use di.App, di.Request and di.SubRequest instead.
Note that the project description data, including the texts, logos, images, and/or trademarks, for each open source project belongs to its rightful owner. If you wish to add or remove any projects, please contact us at [email protected].