All Projects → seborama → Fuego

seborama / Fuego

Licence: apache-2.0
Functional Experiment in Golang

Programming Languages

go
31211 projects - #10 most used programming language
golang
3204 projects

Projects that are alternatives of or similar to Fuego

Aioreactive
Async/await reactive tools for Python 3.9+
Stars: ✭ 215 (+147.13%)
Mutual labels:  streams, functional-programming, functional
Redux Most
Most.js based middleware for Redux. Handle async actions with monadic streams & reactive programming.
Stars: ✭ 137 (+57.47%)
Mutual labels:  streams, functional-programming, functional
Fkit
A functional programming toolkit for JavaScript.
Stars: ✭ 588 (+575.86%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Kaur
A bunch of helper functions to ease the development of your applications.
Stars: ✭ 17 (-80.46%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Rexrex
🦖 Composable JavaScript regular expressions
Stars: ✭ 34 (-60.92%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Moses
Utility library for functional programming in Lua
Stars: ✭ 541 (+521.84%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Pampy.js
Pampy.js: Pattern Matching for JavaScript
Stars: ✭ 544 (+525.29%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Swiftlyext
SwiftlyExt is a collection of useful extensions for Swift 3 standard classes and types 🚀
Stars: ✭ 31 (-64.37%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Kotlin Result
A multiplatform Result monad for modelling success or failure operations.
Stars: ✭ 369 (+324.14%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Lambda
Fun with λ calculus!
Stars: ✭ 65 (-25.29%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Kari.hpp
Experimental library for currying in C++17
Stars: ✭ 58 (-33.33%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Cyclops
An advanced, but easy to use, platform for writing functional applications in Java 8.
Stars: ✭ 1,180 (+1256.32%)
Mutual labels:  streams, functional-programming
Hof
Higher-order functions for c++
Stars: ✭ 467 (+436.78%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Yalinqo
Yet Another LINQ to Objects for PHP [Simplified BSD]
Stars: ✭ 400 (+359.77%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Functional Programming Learning Path
A Learning Path for Functional Programming
Stars: ✭ 582 (+568.97%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Carp
Carp is a programming language designed to work well for interactive and performance sensitive use cases like games, sound synthesis and visualizations.
Stars: ✭ 4,389 (+4944.83%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Immutable Tuple
Immutable finite list objects with constant-time equality testing (===) and no memory leaks.
Stars: ✭ 29 (-66.67%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Request via
RequestVia: A Functional HTTP Client That Wraps Net::HTTP
Stars: ✭ 74 (-14.94%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Eslint Plugin Functional
ESLint rules to disable mutation and promote fp in JavaScript and TypeScript.
Stars: ✭ 282 (+224.14%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional
Coconut
Simple, elegant, Pythonic functional programming.
Stars: ✭ 3,422 (+3833.33%)
Mutual labels:  functional-programming, functional

ƒuego logo

ƒuego - Functional Experiment in Go

Tweet

fuego goreportcard

Buy Me A Coffee

ƒuego example

ƒuego example

Table of content

Overview

Making Go come to functional programming.

This is a research project in functional programming which I hope will prove useful!

ƒuego brings a few functional paradigms to Go. The intent is to save development time while promoting code readability and reduce the risk of complex bugs.

I hope you will find it useful!

Have fun!!

(toc)

Documentation

The code documentation and some examples can be found on godoc.

The tests form the best source of documentation. ƒuego comes with a good collection of unit tests and testable Go examples. Don't be shy, open them up and read them and tinker with them!

Note:
Most tests use unbuffered channels to help detect deadlocks. In real life scenarios, it is recommended to use buffered channels for increased performance.

(toc)

Installation

Download

go get github.com/seborama/fuego

Or for a specific version:

go get gopkg.in/seborama/fuego.v8

Import in your code

You can import the package in the usual Go fashion.

To simplify usage, you can use an alias:

package sample

import ƒ "gopkg.in/seborama/fuego.v8"

...or import as an unqualified dot import:

package sample

import . "gopkg.in/seborama/fuego.v8"

(toc)

Example Stream

    strs := EntrySlice{
        EntryString("a"),
        EntryString("bb"),
        EntryString("cc"),
        EntryString("ddd"),
    }
    
    NewStreamFromSlice(strs, 500).
        Filter(isEntryString).
        Distinct().
        Collect(
            GroupingBy(
                stringLength,
                Mapping(
                    stringToUpper,
                    Filtering(
                        stringLengthGreaterThan(1),
                        ToEntrySlice()))))
    }

    // result: map[1:[] 2:[BB CC] 3:[DDD]]

(toc)

Contributions

Contributions and feedback are welcome.

For contributions, you must develop in TDD fashion and ideally provide Go testable examples (if meaningful).

If you have an idea to improve ƒuego, please share it via an issue. And if you like ƒuego give it a star to show your support for the project - it will put a smile on my face! 😊

Thanks!!

(toc)

The Golden rules of the game

  1. Producers close their channel. In other words, when you create a channel, you are responsible for closing it. Similarly, whenever ƒuego creates a channel, it is responsible for closing it.

  2. Consumers do not close channels.

  3. Producers and consumers should be running in separate Go routines to prevent deadlocks when the channels' buffers fill up.

(toc)

Pressure

Go channels support buffering that affects the behaviour when combining channels in a pipeline.

When the buffer of a Stream's channel of a consumer is full, the producer will not be able to send more data through to it. This protects downstream operations from overloading.

Presently, a Go channel cannot dynamically change its buffer size. This prevents from adapting the stream flexibly. Constructs that use 'select' on channels on the producer side can offer opportunities for mitigation.

(toc)

Concept: Entry

Entry is inspired by hamt.Entry. This is an elegant solution from Yota Toyama: the type can be anything so long as it respects the simple behaviour of theEntry interface. This provides an abstraction of types yet with known behaviour:

  • Hash(): identifies an Entry Uniquely.
  • Equal(): defines equality for a concrete type of Entry. Equal() is expected to be based on Hash() for non-basic types. Equal should ensure the compared Entry is of the same type as the reference Entry. For instance, EntryBool(false) and EntryInt(0) both have a Hash of 0, yet they aren't equal.

Several Entry implementations are provided:

  • EntryBool
  • EntryInt
  • EntryFloat
  • EntryString
  • EntryMap
  • EntrySlice
  • Tuples

Check the godoc for additional methods each of these may provide.

(toc)

Features summary

Streams:

  • Stream
  • IntStream
  • FloatStream
  • CStream - concurrent implementation of Stream

Functional Types:

  • Maybe
  • Tuple
  • Predicate:
    • True
    • False
    • FunctionPredicate

Functions:

  • Consumer
  • Function:
    • ToIntFunction
    • ToFloatFunction
  • BiFunction
  • StreamFunction:
    • FlattenEntrySliceToEntry
  • Predicate:
    • Or
    • Xor
    • And
    • Not / Negate

Collectors:

  • GroupingBy
  • Mapping
  • FlatMapping
  • Filtering
  • Reducing
  • ToEntrySlice
  • ToEntryMap
  • ToEntryMapWithKeyMerge

Check the godoc for full details.

(toc)

Concurrency

As of v8.0.0, a new concurrent model offers to process a stream concurrently while preserving order.

This is not possible yet with all Stream methods but is available with e.g. Stream.Map.

Notes on concurrency

Concurrent streams are challenging to implement owing to ordering issues in parallel processing. At the moment, the view is that the most sensible approach is to delegate control to users. Multiple ƒuego streams can be created and data distributed across as desired. This empowers users of ƒuego to implement the desired behaviour of their pipelines.

Stream has some methods that fan out (e.g. ForEachC). See the godoc for further information and limitations.

I recommend Rob Pike's slides on Go concurrency patterns:

As a proof of concept and for facilitation, ƒuego has a CStream implementation to manage concurrently a collection of Streams.

(toc)

Collectors

A Collector is a mutable reduction operation, optionally transforming the accumulated result.

Collectors can be combined to express complex operations in a concise manner.
Simply put, a collector allows creating custom actions on a Stream.

ƒuego exposes a number of functional methods such as MapToInt, Head, LastN, Filter, etc...
Collectors also provide a few functional methods.

But... what if you need something else? And it is not straighforward or readable when combining the existing methods ƒuego offers?

Enters Collector: implement you own requirement functionally!
Focus on what needs doing in your streams (and delegate the details of the how to the implementation of your Collector).

(toc)

Known limitations

  • several operations may be memory intensive or poorly performing.

(toc)

Buy Me A Coffee

Note that the project description data, including the texts, logos, images, and/or trademarks, for each open source project belongs to its rightful owner. If you wish to add or remove any projects, please contact us at [email protected].