SlinSo / Gotemplatebenchmark
comparing the performance of different template engines
Stars: ✭ 180
Labels
Projects that are alternatives of or similar to Gotemplatebenchmark
Diamond
Diamond is a full-stack web-framework written in The D Programming Language using vibe.d
Stars: ✭ 173 (-3.89%)
Mutual labels: template-engine
Tsung
Tsung is a high-performance benchmark framework for various protocols including HTTP, XMPP, LDAP, etc.
Stars: ✭ 2,185 (+1113.89%)
Mutual labels: benchmark
Craftsman
Craftsman is the workhorse behind the Wrapt framework and provides a suite of CLI commands for quickly scaffolding out new files and projects for your .NET Web APIs with simple CLI commands and configuration files.
Stars: ✭ 165 (-8.33%)
Mutual labels: template-engine
Regex Benchmark
It's just a simple regex benchmark of different programming languages.
Stars: ✭ 171 (-5%)
Mutual labels: benchmark
Hand pose action
Dataset and code for the paper "First-Person Hand Action Benchmark with RGB-D Videos and 3D Hand Pose Annotations", CVPR 2018.
Stars: ✭ 173 (-3.89%)
Mutual labels: benchmark
Windowstemplatestudio
Windows Template Studio quickly builds a UWP app, using a wizard-based UI to turn your needs into a foundation of Windows 10 patterns and best practices.
Stars: ✭ 2,089 (+1060.56%)
Mutual labels: template-engine
Dbnet
DBNet: A Large-Scale Dataset for Driving Behavior Learning, CVPR 2018
Stars: ✭ 172 (-4.44%)
Mutual labels: benchmark
Gbm Perf
Performance of various open source GBM implementations
Stars: ✭ 177 (-1.67%)
Mutual labels: benchmark
Pytorch Retraining
Transfer Learning Shootout for PyTorch's model zoo (torchvision)
Stars: ✭ 167 (-7.22%)
Mutual labels: benchmark
Express Es6 Template Engine
Rendering engine for Express that uses ES6 javascript string templates as syntax.
Stars: ✭ 175 (-2.78%)
Mutual labels: template-engine
Microconfig
Modern tool for microservice configuration management
Stars: ✭ 180 (+0%)
Mutual labels: template-engine
Spring Boot Email Tools
A set of services and tools for sending emails in a Spring Boot 1.5.x application using a Template Engine
Stars: ✭ 164 (-8.89%)
Mutual labels: template-engine
Quicktemplate
Fast, powerful, yet easy to use template engine for Go. Optimized for speed, zero memory allocations in hot paths. Up to 20x faster than html/template
Stars: ✭ 2,287 (+1170.56%)
Mutual labels: template-engine
Sangrenel
Apache Kafka load testing "...basically a cloth bag filled with small jagged pieces of scrap iron"
Stars: ✭ 180 (+0%)
Mutual labels: benchmark
Train Ticket
Train Ticket - A Benchmark Microservice System
Stars: ✭ 180 (+0%)
Mutual labels: benchmark
Tpcds Kit
TPC-DS benchmark kit with some modifications/fixes
Stars: ✭ 176 (-2.22%)
Mutual labels: benchmark
goTemplateBenchmark
comparing the performance of different template engines
full featured template engines
precompilation to Go code
- ego
- removed - egon
- egonslinso
- ftmpl
- Gorazor
- Quicktemplate
- Hero
- Jade
special benchmarks for comparison
- Go text/template (do not use this for HTML)
- StaticString - Use one static string for the whole Template to have a base time
- DirectBuffer - Use go to write the HTML by hand to the buffer
transpiling to Go Template
- Damsel I won't benchmark transpiling engines, because transpilation should just happen once at startup. If you cache the transpilation result, which is recommended, you would have the same performance numbers as html/template for rendering.
Why?
Just for fun. Go Templates work nice out of the box and should be used for rendering from a security point of view. If you care about performance you should cache the rendered output.
Sometimes there are templates that cannot be reasonably cached. Then you possibly need a really fast template engine with code generation.
Results dev machine
local desktop: ryzen 3900x
Changes with 1.15
- benchmarks run on a new system. I ran 1.14.13 and 1.15.5 on the same machine.
Changes with 1.14
- quite a few slowdowns, but I did not do any profiling. needs more testing.
Changes with 1.11
- Pongo and Soy got about 25% improved
Changes with 1.9
There are quite some impressive performance improvements. Almost all pre compilation engines gained 10%-20%.
special benchmarks
| Name | Runs | ns/op | B/op | allocations/op |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ComplexGoDirectBuffer | 7,715,667 | 456 | 0 | 0 |
| ComplexGoStaticString | 296,467,746 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
comparing: go1.15.8 to go version go1.16 linux/amd64
name old time/op new time/op delta
ComplexGoDirectBuffer-24 472ns ± 0% 456ns ± 0% -3.45%
ComplexGoStaticString-24 12.4ns ± 0% 11.7ns ± 0% -5.65%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
ComplexGoDirectBuffer-24 0.00B 0.00B 0.00%
ComplexGoStaticString-24 0.00B 0.00B 0.00%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
ComplexGoDirectBuffer-24 0.00 0.00 0.00%
ComplexGoStaticString-24 0.00 0.00 0.00%
simple benchmarks
full featured template engines
| Name | Runs | µs/op | B/op | allocations/op |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ace | 287,395 | 12.796 | 1,249 | 40 |
| Amber | 461,578 | 8.303 | 977 | 36 |
| Golang | 466,560 | 7.928 | 897 | 35 |
| GolangText | 1,460,233 | 2.582 | 128 | 7 |
| Handlebars | 269,463 | 14.150 | 3,967 | 78 |
| JetHTML | 3,455,011 | 1.008 | 0 | 0 |
| Mustache | 834,798 | 4.270 | 1,530 | 29 |
| Pongo2 | 589,389 | 5.933 | 2,074 | 32 |
| Soy | 929,354 | 3.935 | 1,320 | 20 |
comparing: go1.15.8 to go version go1.16 linux/amd64
name old time/op new time/op delta
Golang-24 8.19µs ± 0% 7.93µs ± 0% -3.14%
GolangText-24 2.54µs ± 0% 2.58µs ± 0% +1.49%
Ace-24 13.0µs ± 0% 12.8µs ± 0% -1.39%
Amber-24 8.62µs ± 0% 8.30µs ± 0% -3.63%
Mustache-24 4.16µs ± 0% 4.27µs ± 0% +2.74%
Pongo2-24 5.79µs ± 0% 5.93µs ± 0% +2.40%
Handlebars-24 13.9µs ± 0% 14.2µs ± 0% +1.67%
Soy-24 3.93µs ± 0% 3.93µs ± 0% +0.20%
JetHTML-24 0.99µs ± 0% 1.01µs ± 0% +1.31%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
Golang-24 1.02kB ± 0% 0.90kB ± 0% -12.49%
GolangText-24 128B ± 0% 128B ± 0% 0.00%
Ace-24 1.38kB ± 0% 1.25kB ± 0% -9.36%
Amber-24 1.10kB ± 0% 0.98kB ± 0% -11.58%
Mustache-24 1.57kB ± 0% 1.53kB ± 0% -2.55%
Pongo2-24 2.07kB ± 0% 2.07kB ± 0% 0.00%
Handlebars-24 3.98kB ± 0% 3.97kB ± 0% -0.40%
Soy-24 1.35kB ± 0% 1.32kB ± 0% -2.37%
JetHTML-24 0.00B 0.00B 0.00%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
Golang-24 35.0 ± 0% 35.0 ± 0% 0.00%
GolangText-24 7.00 ± 0% 7.00 ± 0% 0.00%
Ace-24 40.0 ± 0% 40.0 ± 0% 0.00%
Amber-24 36.0 ± 0% 36.0 ± 0% 0.00%
Mustache-24 29.0 ± 0% 29.0 ± 0% 0.00%
Pongo2-24 32.0 ± 0% 32.0 ± 0% 0.00%
Handlebars-24 78.0 ± 0% 78.0 ± 0% 0.00%
Soy-24 20.0 ± 0% 20.0 ± 0% 0.00%
JetHTML-24 0.00 0.00 0.00%
precompilation to Go code
| Name | Runs | µs/op | B/op | allocations/op |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ego | 2,782,954 | 1.314 | 85 | 8 |
| EgonSlinso | 10,311,388 | 0.305 | 0 | 0 |
| Ftmpl | 2,095,531 | 1.710 | 1,095 | 12 |
| Gorazor | 4,343,186 | 0.830 | 512 | 5 |
| Hero | 27,075,139 | 0.135 | 0 | 0 |
| Jade | 41,323,922 | 0.088 | 0 | 0 |
| Quicktemplate | 13,077,282 | 0.246 | 0 | 0 |
comparing: go1.15.8 to go version go1.16 linux/amd64
name old time/op new time/op delta
Ego-24 1.30µs ± 0% 1.31µs ± 0% +1.47%
EgonSlinso-24 287ns ± 0% 305ns ± 0% +6.31%
Quicktemplate-24 224ns ± 0% 246ns ± 0% +9.96%
Ftmpl-24 1.90µs ± 0% 1.71µs ± 0% -9.81%
Gorazor-24 794ns ± 0% 830ns ± 0% +4.57%
Hero-24 141ns ± 0% 135ns ± 0% -4.26%
Jade-24 84.1ns ± 0% 87.8ns ± 0% +4.42%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
Ego-24 85.0B ± 0% 85.0B ± 0% 0.00%
EgonSlinso-24 0.00B 0.00B 0.00%
Quicktemplate-24 0.00B 0.00B 0.00%
Ftmpl-24 1.09kB ± 0% 1.09kB ± 0% 0.00%
Gorazor-24 512B ± 0% 512B ± 0% 0.00%
Hero-24 0.00B 0.00B 0.00%
Jade-24 0.00B 0.00B 0.00%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
Ego-24 8.00 ± 0% 8.00 ± 0% 0.00%
EgonSlinso-24 0.00 0.00 0.00%
Quicktemplate-24 0.00 0.00 0.00%
Ftmpl-24 12.0 ± 0% 12.0 ± 0% 0.00%
Gorazor-24 5.00 ± 0% 5.00 ± 0% 0.00%
Hero-24 0.00 0.00 0.00%
Jade-24 0.00 0.00 0.00%
more complex test with template inheritance (if possible)
full featured template engines
| Name | Runs | µs/op | B/op | allocations/op |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ComplexGolang | 49,890 | 73.015 | 7,774 | 285 |
| ComplexGolangText | 123,493 | 31.905 | 2,532 | 102 |
| ComplexJetHTML | 227,565 | 14.653 | 534 | 5 |
| ComplexMustache | 129,079 | 27.913 | 7,400 | 155 |
comparing: go1.15.8 to go version go1.16 linux/amd64
name old time/op new time/op delta
ComplexGolang-24 73.1µs ± 0% 73.0µs ± 0% -0.13%
ComplexGolangText-24 32.2µs ± 0% 31.9µs ± 0% -0.81%
ComplexMustache-24 27.7µs ± 0% 27.9µs ± 0% +0.93%
ComplexJetHTML-24 15.8µs ± 0% 14.7µs ± 0% -7.41%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
ComplexGolang-24 8.78kB ± 0% 7.77kB ± 0% -11.49%
ComplexGolangText-24 2.71kB ± 0% 2.53kB ± 0% -6.50%
ComplexMustache-24 7.57kB ± 0% 7.40kB ± 0% -2.22%
ComplexJetHTML-24 550B ± 0% 534B ± 0% -2.91%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
ComplexGolang-24 285 ± 0% 285 ± 0% 0.00%
ComplexGolangText-24 102 ± 0% 102 ± 0% 0.00%
ComplexMustache-24 155 ± 0% 155 ± 0% 0.00%
ComplexJetHTML-24 5.00 ± 0% 5.00 ± 0% 0.00%
precompilation to Go code
| Name | Runs | µs/op | B/op | allocations/op |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ComplexEgo | 536,416 | 6.340 | 568 | 31 |
| ComplexEgoSlinso | 1,000,000 | 3.083 | 160 | 2 |
| ComplexFtmpl | 480,680 | 7.638 | 4,912 | 38 |
| ComplexGorazor | 832,575 | 4.436 | 2,720 | 21 |
| ComplexHero | 3,439,156 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 |
| ComplexJade | 4,865,839 | 0.705 | 0 | 0 |
| ComplexQuicktemplate | 2,812,012 | 1.258 | 0 | 0 |
comparing: go1.15.8 to go version go1.16 linux/amd64
name old time/op new time/op delta
ComplexEgo-24 6.55µs ± 0% 6.34µs ± 0% -3.27%
ComplexQuicktemplate-24 1.18µs ± 0% 1.26µs ± 0% +6.52%
ComplexEgoSlinso-24 2.83µs ± 0% 3.08µs ± 0% +8.94%
ComplexFtmpl-24 7.69µs ± 0% 7.64µs ± 0% -0.71%
ComplexGorazor-24 4.54µs ± 0% 4.44µs ± 0% -2.33%
ComplexHero-24 1.01µs ± 0% 1.00µs ± 0% -0.89%
ComplexJade-24 706ns ± 0% 705ns ± 0% -0.08%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
ComplexEgo-24 592B ± 0% 568B ± 0% -4.05%
ComplexQuicktemplate-24 0.00B 0.00B 0.00%
ComplexEgoSlinso-24 160B ± 0% 160B ± 0% 0.00%
ComplexFtmpl-24 4.94kB ± 0% 4.91kB ± 0% -0.49%
ComplexGorazor-24 2.87kB ± 0% 2.72kB ± 0% -5.29%
ComplexHero-24 0.00B 0.00B 0.00%
ComplexJade-24 0.00B 0.00B 0.00%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
ComplexEgo-24 31.0 ± 0% 31.0 ± 0% 0.00%
ComplexQuicktemplate-24 0.00 0.00 0.00%
ComplexEgoSlinso-24 2.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% 0.00%
ComplexFtmpl-24 38.0 ± 0% 38.0 ± 0% 0.00%
ComplexGorazor-24 22.0 ± 0% 21.0 ± 0% -4.55%
ComplexHero-24 0.00 0.00 0.00%
ComplexJade-24 0.00 0.00 0.00%
Security
All packages assume that template authors are trusted. If you allow custom templates you have to sanitize your user input e.g. bluemonday. Generally speaking I would suggest to sanitize every input not just HTML-input.
Attention: This part is not updated since 2016.
| Framework | Security | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Ace | No | |
| amber | No | |
| ego | Partial (html.EscapeString) | only HTML, others need to be called manually |
| egon | Partial (html.EscapeString) | only HTML, others need to be called manually |
| egonslinso | Partial (html.EscapeString) | only HTML, others need to be called manually |
| ftmpl | Partial (html.EscapeString) | only HTML, others need to be called manually |
| Go | Yes | contextual escaping html/template Security Model |
| Gorazor | Partial (template.HTMLEscapeString) | only HTML, others need to be called manually |
| Handlebars | Partial (raymond.escape) | only HTML |
| Hero | Partial (html.EscapeString) | only HTML, others need to be called manually |
| Jade | Partial (html.EscapeString) | Autoescape for HTML, others need to be called manually |
| Jet | Partial (html.EscapeString) | Autoescape for HTML, others need to be called manually |
| Kasia | Partial (kasia.WriteEscapedHtml) | only HTML |
| Mustache | Partial (template.HTMLEscape) | only HTML |
| Pongo2 | Partial (pongo2.filterEscape, pongo2.filterEscapejs) | autoescape only escapes HTML, others could be implemented as pongo filters |
| Quicktemplate | Partial (html.EscapeString) | only HTML, others need to be called manually |
| Soy | Partial (template.HTMLEscapeString, url.QueryEscape, template.JSEscapeString) | autoescape only escapes HTML, contextual escaping is defined as a project goal |
Note that the project description data, including the texts, logos, images, and/or trademarks,
for each open source project belongs to its rightful owner.
If you wish to add or remove any projects, please contact us at [email protected].