All Projects → micro-api → Micro Api

micro-api / Micro Api

Licence: other
A concise hypermedia API format for the web, using JSON-LD.

Projects that are alternatives of or similar to Micro Api

Admin
A beautiful and fully-featured administration interface builder for hypermedia APIs
Stars: ✭ 335 (+509.09%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Schemaorg
Schema.org - schemas and supporting software
Stars: ✭ 4,372 (+7849.09%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Jqaas
jq as a service
Stars: ✭ 22 (-60%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Jsonld Java
JSON-LD implementation for Java
Stars: ✭ 337 (+512.73%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Schema Generator
PHP Model Scaffolding from Schema.org and other RDF vocabularies
Stars: ✭ 379 (+589.09%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Web Karma
Information Integration Tool
Stars: ✭ 489 (+789.09%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
React Schemaorg
Type-checked Schema.org JSON-LD for React
Stars: ✭ 262 (+376.36%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Structured Data Testing Tool
A library and command line tool to help inspect and test for Structured Data.
Stars: ✭ 34 (-38.18%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Pyld
JSON-LD processor written in Python
Stars: ✭ 413 (+650.91%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Api Platform
Create REST and GraphQL APIs, scaffold Jamstack webapps, stream changes in real-time.
Stars: ✭ 7,144 (+12889.09%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Schema Dts
JSON-LD TypeScript types for Schema.org vocabulary
Stars: ✭ 338 (+514.55%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Activity
ActivityStreams & ActivityPub in golang, oh my!
Stars: ✭ 373 (+578.18%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Extruct
Extract embedded metadata from HTML markup
Stars: ✭ 573 (+941.82%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Schema.net
Schema.org objects turned into strongly typed C# POCO classes for use in .NET. All classes can be serialized into JSON/JSON-LD and XML, typically used to represent structured data in the head section of html page.
Stars: ✭ 336 (+510.91%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Wp Structuring Markup
🔌 WordPress: Plug-in Markup (JSON-LD) structured in schema.org
Stars: ✭ 26 (-52.73%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Jsonld
JSON-LD processor for PHP
Stars: ✭ 280 (+409.09%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Hugo Theme Meme
You can’t spell aWEsoME without MEME! 😝
Stars: ✭ 459 (+734.55%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Webpub Manifest
📜 A JSON based Web Publication Manifest format used at the core of the Readium project
Stars: ✭ 46 (-16.36%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Json Silo
Contextual data silo for the IoT and Smart Spaces. We believe in an open Internet of Things.
Stars: ✭ 10 (-81.82%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld
Json Ld.org
JSON for Linked Data
Stars: ✭ 722 (+1212.73%)
Mutual labels:  json-ld

Micro API

Micro API is a subset of JSON-LD intended for representing hypermedia APIs. It includes a vocabulary, and semantics for CRUD operations. As the name implies, it is intended to be concise and generic. Its registered media type is:

Content-Type: application/vnd.micro+json

The current published version is 2017-04-25, and the media type is registered with the IANA.

Introduction

Micro API simplifies JSON-LD by limiting it to a subset which can be traversed reliably without using processing algorithms. It is designed to look like vanilla JSON and does not assume any prior knowledge of JSON-LD, RDF, OWL, and semantic web in general.

The goal is to reduce these concepts into their most minimal forms possible, and add affordances needed for APIs, such as querying, creating, updating, and deleting resources. It can be considered a hypermedia format, and it conforms to Representational State Transfer (REST) at the highest level.

Example payloads and HTTP requests should be considered non-normative.

The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, NOT RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL in this specification have the meaning defined in RFC 2119.

Vocabulary

This section should be considered normative.

Micro API introduces a small vocabulary focused on APIs that is not covered by other standards.

Property Type Description
id String, Number A unique value used for identifying resources, most often the primary key in a database.
meta Object Any meta-information may be contained here.
query Object A container for showing information about the current query.
operate Object Reserved for application-specific, arbitrary operations to update resources.
error Object If a request fails for any reason, it MUST return an error in the payload.
isArray Boolean For properties, indicates if their values are arrays (this is lacking in RDF). If this is missing, it should be considered false.

Payload Restrictions

This section should be considered normative.

In general, the payload should look like the flattened form of JSON-LD, with some additional restrictions:

  • The root node MUST be a singular object.
  • There SHOULD be a top-level @context object, containing at least the context for Micro API: http://micro-api.org/context.jsonld, a @base and a @vocab valued by the entry IRI suffixed with a #. If there is not, then the context may be referenced using a Link header in the response.
  • Resources MUST contain a unique href and id, no blank nodes are allowed. The href is an IRI (or an alias for @id in JSON-LD parlance), which is not to be confused with id which is an application-specific identifier.
  • Resources SHOULD be represented as an array via the default graph. The only exception is if and only if one resource is expected.
  • References MUST be represented as a singular object with either the href property and/or the id property.

Entry Point

The expectation of a Micro API entry point is to enumerate types and properties and provide links to collections. It MUST contain the definitions at the top-level, valued as an array of objects, and the type as Ontology.

GET /
{
  "href": "/",
  "type": "Ontology",
  "definitions": [ ... ],
  "Person": { "href": "/people" },
  "Movie": { "href": "/movies" }
}

Definitions communicate the overall schema of the API which is useful for machine clients, and also may include documentation for humans. Here is an example of what they might look like:

[
  { "href": "#name", "id": "name", "label": "Name",
    "propertyOf": [ "#Person", "#Movie" ],
    "propertyType": "xsd:string",
    "type": "Property", "comment": "Given name."
  },
  { "href": "#actor", "id": "actor", "label": "Actors",
    "propertyOf": [ "#Movie" ],
    "propertyType": "#Person", "isArray": true,
    "type": "Property", "comment": "People who acted in a movie."
  },
  { "href": "#Person", "id": "Person", "label": "Person",
    "type": "Class", "comment": "A human being."
  },
  { "href": "#Movie", "id": "Movie", "label": "Movie",
    "type": "Class", "comment": "A moving picture."
  }
]

If the @context is omitted in the payload at the top level, then it must be referenced in a Link header in the response. Important: if done this way, the external @context should be inlined since JSON-LD processors will not dereference it.

{
  "@context": {
    /* Merge this external context:
       http://micro-api.org/context.jsonld */
    "@base": "http://example.com/",
    "@vocab": "http://example.com/#"
  }
}

The @vocab field of a Micro API MUST be the path to the API suffixed with the # character, so that dereferencing always refers to the entry point.

The Link header may be formatted like so:

Link:
  <http://example.com/context.jsonld>;
  rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#context";
  type="application/ld+json"

For display purposes, it has been broken into multiple lines, but HTTP headers must always be on one line.

Finding Resources

A GET request MAY be allowed on the collection IRI for a particular type.

GET /movies
{
  "href": "/movies",
  "graph": [ {
    "type": "Movie",
    "href": "/movies/1",
    "id": 1,
    "name": "The Matrix",
    "actor": {
      "href": "/movies/1/actors",
      "id": [ 1, 2, 3 ]
    }
  } ]
}

Dereferencing a href MUST return types corresponding to that property.

GET /movies/the-matrix/actors?limit=1
{
  "href": "/movies/the-matrix/actors",
  "graph": [ {
    "type": "Person",
    "href": "/people/1",
    "id": 1,
    "name": "Keanu Reeves",
    "reverse": {
      "actor": {
        "href": "/people/1/acted-in",
        "id": [ 1 ]
      }
    }
  } ]
}

It may be OPTIONAL to wrap the resources in a graph if and only if exactly one resource is expected. For example:

GET /people/1
{
  "type": "Person",
  "href": "/people/1",
  "id": 1,
  "name": "Keanu Reeves",
  "reverse": {
    "actor": {
      "href": "/people/1/acted-in",
      "id": [ 1 ]
    }
  }
}

Creating Resources

Requesting to create an resource MAY be allowed at the collection IRI for that type. The payload MUST be a valid Micro API document, and referenced IDs must be specified using the id property.

POST /people
{
  "graph": [ {
    "name": "John Doe",
    "reverse": {
      "actor": {
        "id": [ "memento" ]
      }
    }
  } ]
}

It may be OPTIONAL to wrap the resource in a graph array if and only if one resource is to be created.

It may be helpful for the response to have a Location header, but it is not required since the response body may include a link to the created resource.

Updating Resources

IDs MUST be specified in the payload per resource to update, and PATCH requests can be made wherever the resource exists (corollary: IDs can not be changed, only specified).

PATCH /people
{
  "graph": [ {
    "id": "john-doe",
    "name": "Johnny Doe",
    "reverse": {
      "actor": {
        "id": [ "point-break" ]
      }
    },
    "operate": {}
  } ]
}

It may be OPTIONAL to wrap the update in a graph array if and only if one resource is to be updated.

If the a specified resource does not exist at the requested location, it SHOULD return an error. The assumption is that the PATCH method replaces the fields specified. There is a special operate property which allows for arbitrary updates, which this specification is agnostic about. In common update cases, it may be desirable to reject upserts (the PUT method defines that a resource may be created), so PATCH is typically what you want to do.

PATCH requests can update existing resources, however Micro API does not define the semantics to create or delete resources with this method. By setting a link's id property to null (for a to-one relationship) or [] (empty array for a to-many relationship), it removes the link.

Deleting Resources

DELETE /people/john-doe

A delete request can return no payload (HTTP 204 No Content) if it succeeds. It can apply to any IRI, including collections.

DELETE /people/john-doe/children

In this example, the request means delete all of the resources at this IRI, not just the link.

Error Response

If a request fails for any reason, it MUST return a error object. The contents of the error object are opaque to this specification.

{
  "error": {
    "label": "NotFoundError",
    "comment": "The requested resource was not found."
  }
}

Querying

Micro API does not specify anything about pagination, filtering, sparse fields, sorting, etc. For example, the query object MAY contain hints on what queries can be appended to GET requests, with further information about the query provided by a vocabulary (definitions are optional):

{
  "query": {
    "@context": null,
    "include": [],
    "sort": {},
    "field": {},
    "match": {},
    "limit": 1000,
    "offset": 0
  }
}

Unregistered Media Type

One may use MessagePack instead of JSON as the serialization format for greater bandwidth savings. Since MessagePack is an unregistered media type, the corresponding Micro API media type may be unregistered as well:

Content-Type: application/x-micro-api

It is completely OPTIONAL to support this unregistered media type, but it should be interpreted as Micro API with MessagePack enabled.

Prior Art

Micro API builds upon JSON-LD, which is a W3C recommendation. A JSON-based serialization format has the advantage of widespread tooling and developer understanding.

In contrast to Linked Data Platform, it does not use the Turtle format, which is useful only for working within RDF. It also lacks a concept of "containers", which assumes that relationships are hierarchical. What is similar is that both stipulate which actions may be taken on resources.

Micro API is an alternative for Hydra, another specification for Web APIs. It is much less prescriptive than Hydra, and is implicit in cases which Hydra is more explicit. For example, some differences are:

  • Collection: all resources are collections.
  • Operation: these are assumed to match HTTP semantics. Only PATCH requests may have special application-specific operations, using operate.
  • Templated link: clients must follow server links and only queries are allowed.
  • API documentation: this is expected to contain natural language.

A key difference between Micro API and Hydra is that Micro API does not assume that documentation is machine-processable. Why this matters is that natural language may be the only way to express application logic.

About

The author of this document is Dali Zheng. The source for this document is on GitHub. It is licensed under the CC0 1.0 License.

Note that the project description data, including the texts, logos, images, and/or trademarks, for each open source project belongs to its rightful owner. If you wish to add or remove any projects, please contact us at [email protected].