rain-1 / S
Labels
Projects that are alternatives of or similar to S
s
After the Shellshock
bug happened, they fixed the parsing bug in bash that let people hijack
webservers by simply including { :; }.
Fixing a bug after it's been found is good but it doesn't have to be the end. Often you should think about the bigger picture and see why it was ever a bug in the first place.
I suspected that since bash syntax is very complex, the parser is going to be a lot of complicated code too. So I did some line counts of various shells to see what the situation is like:
.c .h
gnu bash: 138227, 13746
zsh: 135589, 5698
shivers scsh: 118475 (scheme)
templeos: 119115
mirbsd mksh: 29223, 2562
debian dash: 16503, 2084
freebsd sh: 15453, 1622
es shell: 9017, 1436
plan9 rc: 5989, 327
execline: 3794, 117
The line count for TempleOS isn't just counting its shell. It's the linecount of the entire system: The operating system kernel, the compiler, the shell, the drawing program, the graphical user interface, the 3D flight simulator. Bash, zsh and scsh have more code in them than an entire operating system.
Shell syntax being overcomplex and ideosyncratic is a long-standing problem. Other than shellshock, annoyances happen on a daily basis. Like the time a bug in a bash script in steam rm -rf'd people's home directory Ran steam. It deleted everything. I've had makefiles break a few times because there's a space in my path. It took these people four years to fix that Build failure when builddir contains spaces.
My idea to improve things is to use an extremely minimal shell with the simplest syntax possible.
The new command interpreter
So I designed a new shell that aims to be extremely simple, and implemented it in a small number of lines of code. Right now it's 780 lines plus 1200 for the linenoise library. (Technically it is a "command interpreter" not a shell since shell implies it implements the POSIX shell standard).
Here is the man page for s:
S(1) BSD General Commands Manual S(1)
NAME
s — command line interpreter
SYNOPSIS
s [-dvh] [SCRIPT ...]
DESCRIPTION
s has two main modes of operation: interactive shell and script processor.
If the SCRIPT is provided it will execute that file with optional given
arguments. Alternatively you can provide commands via stdin.
Otherwise if you start s in a terminal you will be given an interactive
shell prompt like this:
s$ echo hello world!
hello world!
OPTIONS
-d Enable debug mode, reporting becomes more verbose showing file and
line number of where the error or warning occurred.
-v Print version and copyright info and exit.
-h Print usage info and exit.
SYNTAX
The lexical syntax of the shell language is very strictly tokenized based
on spaces.
Variables may occur inside tokens with ${FOO} syntax, the {}'s are
optional for when variables need to be next to other strings:
s$ set FOO bar
s$ set avar value
s$ echo $FOO ${avar}
bar value
s$ echo $FOO$avar
barvalue
s$ echo ${FOO}string$avar
barstringvalue
See the BUILTINS section below for info on setting variables.
If found at the beginning of a token the ~ character expands to ${HOME} as
a shortcut for the user's home directory.
Single and double quotes are used to group the enclosed strings into one
token. Variables are only expanded inside double quotes. You can escape
characters in quotes by using backslashes, allowing you to insert the same
quote character inside a string, as well as inserting newline, tab, and
spaces. Quotes can also be inserted inside the other quote types without
escaping them.
s$ echo "I am using the '$SHELL' shell"
I am using the '/bin/s' shell
s$ echo 'I am using the "$SHELL" shell'
I am using the "$SHELL" shell
s$ echo "you can use backslash as well: \" \'"
you can use backslash as well: " '
$ echo 'person\tbalance\nRichard\t$500\nJohn\t$300'
person balance
Richard $500
John $300
Backticks can also be used to expand commands quoted inside to their out‐
put:
s$ xargs rm `cat oldfiles.txt` # delete all files found in oldfiles.txt
s$ set CFILES `glob *.c` # make $CFILES equal to a list of all C files
The # character, as seen above, starts a comment until the end of the
line.
The grammar is line based. Sequences of tokens are treated as commands and
the operators |, &&, and || are parsed in order of tightest binding first.
File redirection is done with separate commands,
pipes are needed:
s$ echo "hello world" | > file.txt
s$ echo "hello world again" | >> file.txt
s$ cat | < file.txt
hello world
hello world again
& at the end of a line can specify that a job should be run in the back‐
ground.
A backslash at the end of the line allows for commands to span multiple
lines.
BUILTINS
source SCRIPT [...]
Open and execute commands in SCRIPT with the optional arguments
provided.
cd [DIR | -]
Change current working directory to DIR. If DIR is not supplied,
change to $HOME instead. If - is given switch directories to pre‐
vious working directory, stored in $OWD.
set VAR VAL
Set the environment variable given by VAR equal to VAL.
unset VAR
Remove environment variable VAR.
exit [N]
Exit s with code N, defaults to 0.
ENVIRONMENT
SHELL The full pathname to the shell.
HOME The home directory of the current user.
PWD Current working directory.
OWD Previous working directory.
PATH A colon-separated list of directories in which s looks for com‐
mands in.
AUTHORS
rain-1 <[email protected]>
Ed van Bruggen <[email protected]>
LICENSE
BSD 3 Clause
SEE ALSO
execline(1)
View source code and report bugs at: <https://github.com/rain-1/s>
S v0.0.0 Jun 28, 2017 S v0.0.0
The important thing is what's missing: we don't have globs or "splatting" where
a variable $FOO turns into multiple command line arguments. One token stays
one token forever. This is a "no surprises" straightforward approach.
Look at how many ways one can screw up passing or copy an array in this oil shell blog post
We don't even have redirection operators > in the shell language. They are
added as extra programs. So you write grep foo bar | > out.txt. > is just
another Unix command. < is essentially cat. A glob program is also
provided along with s, so you write glob rm *.
The benefit of this extreme minimalism is that the implementation can be done with a very logical pipeline of operations: tokenizing splits the input based on spaces and expands the variables out, parsing looks for the operators and builds an AST, interpreting is a simple recursive walk down the AST implementing the various operators.
Trying it out
git clone --recurse-submodules [email protected]:rain-1/s.git./makesfile./s
Changes
What's new with s:
- s supports russian, japanese, unicode We have now switched to the yhirose utf8-support branch of linenoise.
- s does not use makefiles! No more nasty makefiles. ./make builds it using a super simple shell script.
End
What do you think? I would be very interested in hearing people's opinions about s and the more general idea of stripping programs down to their essential parts. Feel free to comment or make 'issues' on the repo if you have any criticism, suggestions or just want to discuss.