All Projects → ledermann → Docker Rails Base

ledermann / Docker Rails Base

Licence: mit
Optimized Docker base images for Rails applications

Programming Languages

ruby
36898 projects - #4 most used programming language

Projects that are alternatives of or similar to Docker Rails Base

rails5-docker-alpine
Lightweight Docker development environment for Rails using Alpine Linux
Stars: ✭ 71 (-40.83%)
Mutual labels:  alpine, ruby-on-rails
Alpine Mariadb
MariaDB running on Alpine Linux [Docker]
Stars: ✭ 117 (-2.5%)
Mutual labels:  alpine
Gocv Alpine
GoCV-compatible OpenCV 3.4 Alpine 3.7 Docker image
Stars: ✭ 95 (-20.83%)
Mutual labels:  alpine
Pingcrm
PingCRM on Rails - A Ruby on Rails demo application to illustrate how Inertia.js works
Stars: ✭ 106 (-11.67%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails
Lol dba
lol_dba is a small package of rake tasks that scan your application models and displays a list of columns that probably should be indexed. Also, it can generate .sql migration scripts.
Stars: ✭ 1,363 (+1035.83%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails
Covoiturage Libre
UNMAINTAINED
Stars: ✭ 109 (-9.17%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails
Docker Oidc Proxy
Docker Image built on Alpine Linux for secure OpenID Connect (OIDC) proxy authentication
Stars: ✭ 91 (-24.17%)
Mutual labels:  alpine
Flow core
FlowCore is a Rails engine to help you build your automation or business process application.
Stars: ✭ 120 (+0%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails
Alpine Android
🐋 Small docker image for building & testing Android applications.
Stars: ✭ 116 (-3.33%)
Mutual labels:  alpine
Rails admin nestable
RailsAdmin drag & drop custom action sorting list and tree (using the Ancestry gem) 💎
Stars: ✭ 105 (-12.5%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails
Onebody
private member portal for churches, built with Ruby on Rails
Stars: ✭ 1,408 (+1073.33%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails
Alphp
A micro PHP Docker environment based on an Alpine image. Can be used for container publishing, the completed image is only 30-40M
Stars: ✭ 100 (-16.67%)
Mutual labels:  alpine
Active record Events
Manage timestamps in ActiveRecord models
Stars: ✭ 109 (-9.17%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails
Sr mini
A single file Rails app that will have you running a StimulusReflex and CableReady demo in just 2 steps.
Stars: ✭ 98 (-18.33%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails
Ipxe Buildweb
iPXE Prebuilt binary web interface
Stars: ✭ 119 (-0.83%)
Mutual labels:  alpine
Pragma
An expressive, opinionated ecosystem for building beautiful RESTful APIs with Ruby.
Stars: ✭ 93 (-22.5%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails
Sidekiq Cron
Scheduler / Cron for Sidekiq jobs
Stars: ✭ 1,383 (+1052.5%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails
Gdpr Rails
An example project on building a GDPR compliant application
Stars: ✭ 109 (-9.17%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails
Fake api
The fastest way to prototype API in your Rails application
Stars: ✭ 119 (-0.83%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails
Mailjet Gem
[API v3] Mailjet official Ruby GEM
Stars: ✭ 119 (-0.83%)
Mutual labels:  ruby-on-rails

Build images

DockerRailsBase

Building Docker images usually takes a long time. This repo contains base images with preinstalled dependencies for Ruby on Rails, so building a production image will be 2-3 times faster.

What?

When using the official Ruby image, building a Docker image for a typical Rails application requires lots of time for installing dependencies - mainly OS packages, Ruby gems, Ruby gems with native extensions (Nokogiri etc.) and Node modules. This is required every time the app needs to be deployed to production.

I was looking for a way to reduce this time, so I created base images that contain most of the dependencies used in my applications.

And while I'm at it, I also moved as much as possible from the app-specific Dockerfile into the base image by using ONBUILD triggers. This makes the Dockerfile in my apps small and simple.

Performance

I compared building times using a typical Rails application. This is the result on my local machine:

  • Based on official Ruby image: 4:50 min
  • Based on DockerRailsBase: 1:57 min

As you can see, using DockerRailsBase is more than 2 times faster compared to the official Ruby image. It saves nearly 3min on every build.

Note: Before I started timing, the base image was not available on my machine, so it was downloaded first, which took some time. If the base image is already available, the building time is only 1:18min (3 times faster).

How?

This repo is based on the following assumptions:

It uses multi-stage building to build a very small production image. There are two Dockerfiles in this repo, one for the first stage (called Builder) and one for the resulting stage (called Final).

Builder stage

The Builder stage installs Ruby gems and Node modules. It also includes Git, Node.js and some build tools - all we need to compile assets.

  • Based on ruby:3.0.0-alpine
  • Adds packages needed for installing gems and compiling assets: Git, Node.js, Yarn, PostgreSQL client and build tools
  • Adds some standard Ruby gems (Rails 6.1 etc., see Gemfile)
  • Adds some standard Node modules (Vue.js etc., see package.json)
  • Via ONBUILD triggers it installs missing gems and Node modules, then compiles the assets

See Builder/Dockerfile

Final stage

The Final stage builds the production image, which includes just the bare minimum.

  • Based on ruby:3.0.0-alpine
  • Adds packages needed for production: postgresql-client, tzdata, file
  • Via ONBUILD triggers it mainly copies the app and gems from the Builder stage

See Final/Dockerfile

Staying up-to-date

Using Dependabot, every updated Ruby gem or Node module results in an updated image.

How to use for your Rails application

Building the Docker image

Add this Dockerfile to your application:

FROM ledermann/rails-base-builder:3.0.0-alpine AS Builder
FROM ledermann/rails-base-final:3.0.0-alpine
USER app
CMD ["bundle", "exec", "puma", "-C", "config/puma.rb"]

Yes, this is the complete Dockerfile of your Rails app. It's so simple because the work is done by ONBUILD triggers.

Now build the image:

$ docker build .

Building the Docker image with BuildKit

BuildKit requires a little workaround to trigger the ONBUILD statements. Add a COPY statement to the Dockerfile:

FROM ledermann/rails-base-builder:3.0.0-alpine AS Builder
FROM ledermann/rails-base-final:3.0.0-alpine

# Workaround to trigger Builder's ONBUILDs to finish:
COPY --from=Builder /etc/alpine-release /tmp/dummy

USER app
CMD ["bundle", "exec", "puma", "-C", "config/puma.rb"]

Now you can build the image with BuildKit:

docker buildx build .

You can use private npm/Yarn packages by mounting the config file:

docker buildx build --secret id=npmrc,src=$HOME/.npmrc .

or

docker buildx build --secret id=yarnrc,src=$HOME/.yarnrc.yml .

Continuous integration (CI)

Example to build the application's image with GitHub Actions and push it to the GitHub Container Registry:

deploy:
  runs-on: ubuntu-latest

  steps:
    - uses: actions/[email protected]

    - name: Login to GitHub Container Registry
      run: echo ${{ secrets.CR_PAT }} | docker login ghcr.io -u $GITHUB_ACTOR --password-stdin

    - name: Build the image
      run: |
        export COMMIT_TIME=$(git show -s --format=%ci ${GITHUB_SHA})
        export COMMIT_SHA=${GITHUB_SHA}
        docker build --build-arg COMMIT_TIME --build-arg COMMIT_SHA -t ghcr.io/user/repo:latest .

    - name: Push the image
      run: docker push ghcr.io/user/repo:latest

Available Docker images

Both Docker images (Builder and Final) are regularly published at DockerHub and tagged with the current Ruby version:

Beware: The published images are not immutable. When a dependency (e.g. Ruby gem) is updated, the images will be republished using the same tag.

When a new Ruby version comes out, a new tag is introduced and the images will be published using this tag and the former images will not be updated anymore. Here is a list of the tags that have been used in this repo so far:

Ruby version Tag First published
3.0.0 3.0.0-alpine 2021-02-15
2.7.2 2.7.2-alpine 2020-10-10
2.7.1 2.7.1-alpine 2020-05-20
2.6.6 - 2020-04-01
2.6.5 - 2020-01-24

The latest Docker images are also tagged as latest. However, it is not recommended to use this tag in your Rails application, because updating an app to a new Ruby version usually requires some extra work.

FAQ

Why not simply use layer caching?

Docker supports layer caching, so for building images it performs just the needed steps: If there is a layer from a former build and nothing has changed, it will be used. But for dependencies, this means: If a single Ruby gem in the application was updated or added, the step with bundle install is run again, so all gems will be installed again.

Using a prebuilt image improves installing dependencies a lot, because only the different/updated dependencies will be installed - all existing ones will be reused.

What if my app requires slightly different dependencies?

This doesn't matter:

  • A missing Alpine package can be installed with apk add inside your app's Dockerfile.
  • A missing Node module (or version) will be installed with rails assets:precompile via the ONBUILD trigger.
  • A missing Ruby gem (or version) will be installed with bundle install via the ONBUILD trigger.

There are gems included that my app doesn't need. Will they bloat the resulting image?

No. In the build stage there is a bundle clean --force, which uninstalls all gems not referenced in the app's Gemfile.

Note that the project description data, including the texts, logos, images, and/or trademarks, for each open source project belongs to its rightful owner. If you wish to add or remove any projects, please contact us at [email protected].