All Projects → manuelbieh → experimenting-with-babel-7-typescript-and-eslint

manuelbieh / experimenting-with-babel-7-typescript-and-eslint

Licence: other
I want to use Babel features but with TypeScript for type checking. This seems to be an issue.

Programming Languages

javascript
184084 projects - #8 most used programming language
typescript
32286 projects

Experimenting with Babel 7 + TypeScript + ESLint

The story of a (semi successful) attempt to get Babel 7 with TypeScript and ESLint with babel-eslint to work nicely together.

A little bit of background info: I like to be cutting edge and that's why I like Babel a lot. It let's me use future JavaScript today. If there's a proposal for it, there's almost certainly a Babel plugin for it as well. What I also like is typed JavaScript. I used Flow a lot in the past but Flow rhymes with slow, and that's what it is: a memory eating, slow, unreliable monster.

I prefered Flow over TypeScript because I only wanted the type checking without going all-in on the whole TS ecosystem which always felt quite odd to me. I wanted to continue using all the tools I used over all the years. I wanted Babel, not tsc, I wanted ESLint not TSLint and I didn't want to use all the blah-blah-typescript-rewired-awesome-loader-yadayada hacks and workarounds either. In Flow it was as easy as yarn add @babel/preset-flow and that was basically it.

So I was thrilled when I first heard about the possibility to use TypeScript with Babel 7 by installing @babel/preset-typescript - in the same way I was able to use Flow just by installing @babel/preset-flow. I was even more thrilled when I read about the plans of the TypeScript team on dropping TSLint in favor of ESLint.

Until recently I used pluggable-babel-eslint together with eslint-plugin-typescript and "everything" worked in a way I liked but both are deprecated now and will no longer be maintained. The repos say Babel-eslint supports TypeScript now (pluggable-babel-eslint) and Use @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin instead (eslint-plugin-typescript) which is only half the truth. The whole Babel+TypeScript+ESLint thing looks like a total mess to me at the moment.

My goals with this experiment were to:

  • use Babel 7 for transpilation of JSX and TypeScript by using @babel/preset-react and @babel/preset-typescript
  • use babel-eslint as ESLint parser so ESLint can understand Babel features like Optional Chaining which TypeScript does not understand
  • use type definitions as replacement for PropTypes in React components
  • use TypeScript for live type checking in VSCode and/or Atom, but only for things TypeScript does understand. Syntax that is later transpiled via Babel (like Optional Chaining) should ideally just be "ignored" without breaking the linting
  • have all of this working with live linting in VSCode and Atom using ESLint.
  • Put in another words: I (more or less) want to use TypeScript as a more widely adopted, more performant drop-in replacement for Flow.

Things that are working:

Babel transpiles all files correctly and strips out all the type information

I got live validation in VSCode working by adding the following line to my settings.json:

"eslint.validate": ["javascript", "javascriptreact", "typescript", "typescriptreact"]

I can use TypeScript types and interface as PropTypes replacement
… but in [email protected] I get no-undef errors for every type and interface I define

The TypeScript parser built into VSCode is somehow able to ignore invalid TypeScript and still give me type checking for the correct parts of the code. The integrated TypeScript parser in VSCode seems to be more liberal than tsc which fails entirely on invalid syntax (e.g. when using syntax that's later transpiled via Babel).

Things that are not working:

@typescript-eslint/parser does not work in files with syntax unknown to TypeScript. Sure, neither TypeScript nor @typescript-eslint/parser care about the Babel config, but not only does it "not work", it breaks completely due to a parsing error (which is somehow logical …) so that all other ESLint errors are not shown in VSCode once a file contains non-TypeScript syntax. So using @typescript-eslint/parser is not an option as I want to continue non-TypeScript compatible Babel features without breaking the linter completely.

Parsing errors can't be ignored when using tsc for type checking. Not by using @ts-ignore not by using @ts-nocheck. Once you use non-standard syntax in .ts/.tsx files, you can't type check them on the CLI via tsc anymore. For some reason it still works fine in VSCode.

ESLint does not know about TypeScript globals. So Pick<Type, 'a' | 'b'> results in an error [no-undef] 'Pick' is not defined. That's kind of annoying and I found no other workaround than adding things like Pick or ReturnType to the globals object of the ESLint config. I have no idea how viable this is in larger projects. It worked fine in one of my previous projects with pluggable-babel-eslint so I guess it should not be that hard to get it working again.

Sure you could disable no-undef in ESLint since TypeScript also takes care of that. Unless you're using "unparseable" non-TypeScript syntax like, you know, Optional Chaining 🙄.

I don't know why, it worked already but it seems like I changed something in the eslintrc (or wherever) so that I now get XYZ is not defined when I use a type XYZ 😕 Ok, got it. Seems like [email protected] does not understand TypeScript keywords like type or interface anymore, not even with @babel/preset-typescript in the .babelrc.

Summary

Issue @typescript-eslint/parser [email protected] [email protected]
ESLint results with non-standard (Babel) syntax (Parse error)
TypeScript errors shown in VS Code
TypeScript keywords like Pick or ReturnType correctly not marked as no-undef error
Types and Interfaces not falsely marked as no-undef

I'd love to see a fully green babel-eslint@11 column. Not sure if these 'Foo' is not defined errors in babel-eslint@11 is regression or if I'm just configuring anything wrong.

Note that the project description data, including the texts, logos, images, and/or trademarks, for each open source project belongs to its rightful owner. If you wish to add or remove any projects, please contact us at [email protected].