ICC 2019 WC prediction
Predicting the winner of 2019 cricket world cup using random forest algorithm
Citing
If you find this code useful in your research, please consider citing the blog:
@misc{sagaricc,
Author = {Abhinav Sagar},
Title = {ICC 2019 Cricket World Cup Prediction using Machine Learning},
Year = {2019},
Journal = {Towards Data Science},
}
I used Machine Learning to make a model using scikit-learn, pandas, numpy, seaborn and matplotlib to predict the results of ICC 2019 Cricket World Cup.
Check out the corresponding medium blog post https://towardsdatascience.com/icc-2019-cricket-world-cup-prediction-using-machine-learning-7c42d848ace1.
Goals
-
Use Machine Learning to predict the winner of ICC 2019 Cricket World Cup.
-
Predict the outcome of individual matches for the entire competition.
-
Run simulation of the next matches i.e semi finals and finals.
These goals present a unique real-world Machine Learning prediction problem and involve solving various Machine Learning tasks: data wrangling, feature extraction and outcome prediction.
Data
I used data sets from Kaggle - Results of the matches since 1975 and 2017. I didn't get the data for 2018 and 2019 so this model might not be that accurate but still I believe this gives a fairly good intuition. Also I removed all the data from 1975 to 2010 since what happened way back in the past will have much less weight than the recent results. For the rest of data files I used the crickbuzz website.
Environment and tools
- Jupyter Notebook
- Numpy
- Pandas
- Seaborn
- Matplotlib
- Scikit-learn
I used the ICC ranking as of MAY 2019 dataset and a dataset containing the fixture of the group stages of the tournament. I compared Support Vector Machines, Logistic Regression, Random Forest and K-Nearest Neighbours model.
Random Forest was the winner with a training accuracy of 70 % and test accuracy of 67.5%.
Installation
pip install -r requirements.txt
jupyter notebook
According to this model England is likely to win this World Cup.
Areas of further Improvement
-
Dataset - to improve dataset you could use 2018 and 2019 years into account by scraping them from the ESPN website and also possibly use the players data to assess the quality of each team player.
-
A confusion matrix would be great to analyse which games the model got wrong.
-
We could ensemble that is we could try stacking more models together to improve the accuracy.
References
License
MIT License
Copyright (c) 2019 Abhinav Sagar
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.