All Projects → insightindustry → Validator Collection

insightindustry / Validator Collection

Licence: mit
Python library of 60+ commonly-used validator functions

Programming Languages

python
139335 projects - #7 most used programming language

Projects that are alternatives of or similar to Validator Collection

Php Validate
Lightweight and feature-rich PHP validation and filtering library. Support scene grouping, pre-filtering, array checking, custom validators, custom messages. 轻量且功能丰富的PHP验证、过滤库。支持场景分组,前置过滤,数组检查,自定义验证器,自定义消息。
Stars: ✭ 225 (+147.25%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Valiktor
Valiktor is a type-safe, powerful and extensible fluent DSL to validate objects in Kotlin
Stars: ✭ 267 (+193.41%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Password Validator
Validates password according to flexible and intuitive specification
Stars: ✭ 224 (+146.15%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Typescript Runtime Type Benchmarks
Benchmark Comparison of Packages with Runtime Validation and TypeScript Support
Stars: ✭ 119 (+30.77%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Laravel Vue Validator
Simple package to display error in vue from laravel validation
Stars: ✭ 32 (-64.84%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Validot
Validot is a performance-first, compact library for advanced model validation. Using a simple declarative fluent interface, it efficiently handles classes, structs, nested members, collections, nullables, plus any relation or combination of them. It also supports translations, custom logic extensions with tests, and DI containers.
Stars: ✭ 198 (+117.58%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
thai-citizen-id-validator
🦉 Validate Thai Citizen ID with 0 dependencies 🇹🇭
Stars: ✭ 35 (-61.54%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Deep Waters
🔥Deep Waters is an easy-to-compose functional validation system for javascript developers 🔥
Stars: ✭ 188 (+106.59%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Govalidator
[Go] Package of validators and sanitizers for strings, numerics, slices and structs
Stars: ✭ 5,163 (+5573.63%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Validator Docs
Validação de CPF, CNPJ, CNH, NIS, Título Eleitoral e Cartão Nacional de Saúde com Laravel.
Stars: ✭ 334 (+267.03%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Validator
Drop in user input validation for your iOS apps.
Stars: ✭ 1,444 (+1486.81%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Vee Validate
✅ Form Validation for Vue.js
Stars: ✭ 8,820 (+9592.31%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
valify
Validates data in JavaScript in a very simple way
Stars: ✭ 13 (-85.71%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Easyvalidation
✔️ A text and input validation library in Kotlin for Android
Stars: ✭ 328 (+260.44%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Lcformvalidation
Javascript based form validation library, third party library / framework agnostic.
Stars: ✭ 58 (-36.26%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Fluidvalidator
General purpose validation system for objects, nested objects, enumerables written in Swift
Stars: ✭ 89 (-2.2%)
Mutual labels:  validation, validation-library
Form Object
Form object to use with Vue components for sending data to a Laravel application using axios.
Stars: ✭ 73 (-19.78%)
Mutual labels:  validation
Legit
input validation framework
Stars: ✭ 81 (-10.99%)
Mutual labels:  validation
React Required If
React PropType to conditionally add `.isRequired` based on other props
Stars: ✭ 72 (-20.88%)
Mutual labels:  validation
Angular Validate
Painless form validation for AngularJS. Powered by the jQuery Validation Plugin.
Stars: ✭ 71 (-21.98%)
Mutual labels:  validation

====================== Validator Collection

Python library of 60+ commonly-used validator functions

.. list-table:: :widths: 10 90 :header-rows: 1

The Validator Collection is a Python library that provides more than 60 functions that can be used to validate the type and contents of an input value.

Each function has a consistent syntax for easy use, and has been tested on Python 2.7, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, and 3.8.

For a list of validators available, please see the lists below.

COMPLETE DOCUMENTATION ON READTHEDOCS: http://validator-collection.readthedocs.io/en/latest


.. contents:: Contents :local: :depth: 3 :backlinks: entry



Installation


To install the Validator Collection, just execute:

.. code:: bash

$ pip install validator-collection

Dependencies:

.. list-table:: :widths: 50 50 :header-rows: 1

    • Python 3.x
    • Python 2.7
    • jsonschema <https://pypi.org/project/jsonschema/>_ for JSON Schema Validation.

    • jsonschema <https://pypi.org/project/jsonschema/>_ for JSON Schema Validation.

      The regex <https://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex>_ drop-in replacement for Python's (buggy) standard re module.

      Conditional dependencies will be automatically installed if you are installing to Python 2.x.



Available Validators and Checkers


Validators

SEE: Validator Reference <http://validator-collection.readthedocs.io/en/latest/validators.html>_

.. list-table:: :widths: 30 30 30 30 30 :header-rows: 1

    • Core
    • Date/Time
    • Numbers
    • File-related
    • Internet-related
    • dict
    • date
    • numeric
    • bytesIO
    • email
    • json
    • datetime
    • integer
    • stringIO
    • url
    • string
    • time
    • float
    • path
    • domain
    • iterable
    • timezone
    • fraction
    • path_exists
    • ip_address
    • none
    • timedelta
    • decimal
    • file_exists
    • ipv4
    • not_empty
    • directory_exists
    • ipv6
    • uuid
    • readable
    • mac_address
    • variable_name
    • writeable
    • mimetype
    • executable

Checkers

SEE: Checker Reference <http://validator-collection.readthedocs.io/en/latest/checkers.html>_

.. list-table:: :widths: 30 30 30 30 30 :header-rows: 1

    • Core
    • Date/Time
    • Numbers
    • File-related
    • Internet-related
    • is_type
    • is_date
    • is_numeric
    • is_bytesIO
    • is_email
    • is_between
    • is_datetime
    • is_integer
    • is_stringIO
    • is_url
    • has_length
    • is_time
    • is_float
    • is_pathlike
    • is_domain
    • are_equivalent
    • is_timezone
    • is_fraction
    • is_on_filesystem
    • is_ip_address
    • are_dicts_equivalent
    • is_timedelta
    • is_decimal
    • is_file
    • is_ipv4
    • is_dict
    • is_directory
    • is_ipv6
    • is_json
    • is_readable
    • is_mac_address
    • is_string
    • is_writeable
    • is_mimetype
    • is_iterable
    • is_executable
    • is_not_empty
    • is_none
    • is_callable
    • is_uuid
    • is_variable_name


Hello, World and Standard Usage


All validator functions have a consistent syntax so that using them is pretty much identical. Here's how it works:

.. code-block:: python

from validator_collection import validators, checkers, errors

email_address = validators.email('[email protected]')

The value of email_address will now be "[email protected]"

email_address = validators.email('this-is-an-invalid-email')

Will raise a ValueError

try: email_address = validators.email(None) # Will raise an EmptyValueError except errors.EmptyValueError: # Handling logic goes here except errors.InvalidEmailError: # More handlign logic goes here

email_address = validators.email(None, allow_empty = True)

The value of email_address will now be None

email_address = validators.email('', allow_empty = True)

The value of email_address will now be None

is_email_address = checkers.is_email('[email protected]')

The value of is_email_address will now be True

is_email_address = checkers.is_email('this-is-an-invalid-email')

The value of is_email_address will now be False

is_email_address = checkers.is_email(None)

The value of is_email_address will now be False

Pretty simple, right? Let's break it down just in case: Each validator comes in two flavors: a validator and a checker.

.. _validators-explained:

Using Validators

SEE: Validator Reference <http://validator-collection.readthedocs.io/en/latest/validators.html>_

A validator does what it says on the tin: It validates that an input value is what you think it should be, and returns its valid form.

Each validator is expressed as the name of the thing being validated, for example email().

Each validator accepts a value as its first argument, and an optional allow_empty boolean as its second argument. For example:

.. code-block:: python

email_address = validators.email(value, allow_empty = True)

If the value you're validating validates successfully, it will be returned. If the value you're validating needs to be coerced to a different type, the validator will try to do that. So for example:

.. code-block:: python

validators.integer(1) validators.integer('1')

will both return an int of 1.

If the value you're validating is empty/falsey and allow_empty is False, then the validator will raise a EmptyValueError exception (which inherits from the built-in ValueError). If allow_empty is True, then an empty/falsey input value will be converted to a None value.

CAUTION: By default, allow_empty is always set to False.

HINT: Some validators (particularly numeric ones like integer) have additional options which are used to make sure the value meets criteria that you set for it. These options are always included as keyword arguments after the allow_empty argument, and are documented for each validator below.

When Validation Fails

Validators raise exceptions when validation fails. All exceptions raised inherit from built-in exceptions like ValueError, TypeError, and IOError.

If the value you're validating fails its validation for some reason, the validator may raise different exceptions depending on the reason. In most cases, this will be a descendent of ValueError though it can sometimes be a TypeError, or an IOError, etc.

For specifics on each validator's likely exceptions and what can cause them, please review the Validator Reference <http://validator-collection.readthedocs.io/en/latest/validators.html>_

HINT: While validators will always raise built-in exceptions from the standard library, to give you greater programmatic control over how to respond when validation fails, we have defined a set of custom exceptions that inherit from those built-ins.

Our custom exceptions provide you with very specific, fine-grained information as to why validation for a given value failed. In general, most validators will raise ValueError or TypeError exceptions, and you can safely catch those and be fine. But if you want to handle specific types of situations with greater control, then you can instead catch EmptyValueError, CannotCoerceError, MaximumValueError, and the like.

For more detailed information, please see:

  • Error Reference <http://validator-collection.readthedocs.io/en/latest/errors.html>_
  • Validator Reference <http://validator-collection.readthedocs.io/en/latest/validators.html>_

Disabling Validation

CAUTION: If you are disabling validators <#disabling-validation>_ using the VALIDATORS_DISABLED environment variable, their related checkers will also be disabled (meaning they will always return True).

Validation can at times be an expensive (in terms of performance) operation. As a result, there are times when you want to disable certain kinds of validation when running in production. Using the Validator-Collection this is simple:

Just add the name of the validator you want disabled to the VALIDATORS_DISABLED environment variable, and validation will automatically be skipped.

CAUTION: VALIDATORS_DISABLED expects a comma-separated list of values. If it isn't comma-separated, it won't work properly.

Here's how it works in practice. Let's say we define the following environment variable:

.. code-block:: bash

$ export VALIDATORS_DISABLED = "variable_name, email, ipv4"

This disables the variable_name(), email(), and ipv4() validators respectively.

Now if we run:

.. code-block:: python

from validator_collection import validators, errors

try: result = validators.variable_name('this is an invalid variable name') except ValueError: # handle the error

The validator will return the value supplied to it un-changed. So that means result will be equal to this is an invalid variable name.

However, if we run:

.. code-block:: python

from validator_collection import validators, errors

try: result = validators.integer('this is an invalid variable name') except errors.NotAnIntegerError: # handle the error

the validator will run and raise NotAnIntegerError.

We can force validators to run (even if disabled using the environment variable) by passing a force_run = True keyword argument. For example:

.. code-block:: python

from validator_collection import validators, errors

try: result = validators.variable_name('this is an invalid variable name', force_run = True) except ValueError: # handle the error

will produce a InvalidVariableNameError (which is a type of ValueError).

.. _checkers-explained:

Using Checkers

Please see the Checker Reference <http://validator-collection.readthedocs.io/en/latest/checkers.html>_

Likewise, a checker is what it sounds like: It checks that an input value is what you expect it to be, and tells you True/False whether it is or not.

IMPORTANT: Checkers do not verify or convert object types. You can think of a checker as a tool that tells you whether its corresponding validator <#using-validators>_ would fail. See Best Practices <#best-practices>_ for tips and tricks on using the two together.

Each checker is expressed as the name of the thing being validated, prefixed by is_. So the checker for an email address is is_email() and the checker for an integer is is_integer().

Checkers take the input value you want to check as their first (and often only) positional argumet. If the input value validates, they will return True. Unlike validators <#using-validators>_, checkers will not raise an exception if validation fails. They will instead return False.

HINT: If you need to know why a given value failed to validate, use the validator instead.

HINT: Some checkers (particularly numeric ones like is_integer()) have additional options which are used to make sure the value meets criteria that you set for it. These options are always optional and are included as keyword arguments after the input value argument. For details, please see the Checker Reference <http://validator-collection.readthedocs.io/en/latest/checkers.html>_.

Disabling Checking

CAUTION: If you are disabling validators using the VALIDATORS_DISABLED environment variable, their related checkers will also be disabled. This means they will always return True unless called with force_run = True.

Checking can at times be an expensive (in terms of performance) operation. As a result, there are times when you want to disable certain kinds of checking when running in production. Using the Validator-Collection this is simple:

Just add the name of the checker you want disabled to the CHECKERS_DISABLED environment variable, and validation will automatically be skipped.

CAUTION: CHECKERS_DISABLED expects a comma-separated list of values. If it isn't comma-separated, it won't work properly.

Here's how it works in practice. Let's say we define the following environment variable:

.. code-block:: bash

$ export CHECKERS_DISABLED = "is_variable_name, is_email, is_ipv4"

This disables the is_variable_name(), is_email(), and is_ipv4() checkers respectively.

Now if we run:

.. code-block:: python

from validator_collection import checkers

result = checkers.is_variable_name('this is an invalid variable name')

result will be True

The checker will return True.

However, if we run:

.. code-block:: python

from validator_collection import checkers

result = validators.is_integer('this is an invalid variable name')

result will be False

the checker will return False

We can force checkers to run (even if disabled using the environment variable) by passing a force_run = True keyword argument. For example:

.. code-block:: python

from validator_collection import checkers

result = checkers.is_variable_name('this is an invalid variable name', force_run = True)

result will be False

will return False.

.. _best-practices:



Best Practices


Checkers <#using-checkers>_ and Validators <#using-validators>_ are designed to be used together. You can think of them as a way to quickly and easily verify that a value contains the information you expect, and then make sure that value is in the form your code needs it in.

There are two fundamental patterns that we find work well in practice.

Defensive Approach: Check, then Convert if Necessary

We find this pattern is best used when we don't have any certainty over a given value might contain. It's fundamentally defensive in nature, and applies the following logic:

#. Check whether value contains the information we need it to or can be converted to the form we need it in. #. If value does not contain what we need but can be converted to what we need, do the conversion. #. If value does not contain what we need but cannot be converted to what we need, raise an error (or handle it however it needs to be handled).

We tend to use this where we're first receiving data from outside of our control, so when we get data from a user, from the internet, from a third-party API, etc.

Here's a quick example of how that might look in code:

.. code-block:: python

from validator_collection import checkers, validators

def some_function(value): # Check whether value contains a whole number. is_valid = checkers.is_integer(value, coerce_value = False)

  # If the value does not contain a whole number, maybe it contains a
  # numeric value that can be rounded up to a whole number.
  if not is_valid and checkers.is_integer(value, coerce_value = True):
      # If the value can be rounded up to a whole number, then do so:
      value = validators.integer(value, coerce_value = True)
  elif not is_valid:
      # Since the value does not contain a whole number and cannot be converted to
      # one, this is where your code to handle that error goes.
      raise ValueError('something went wrong!')

  return value

value = some_function(3.14)

value will now be 4

new_value = some_function('not-a-number')

will raise ValueError

Let's break down what this code does. First, we define some_function() which takes a value. This function uses the is_integer() checker to see if value contains a whole number, regardless of its type.

If it doesn't contain a whole number, maybe it contains a numeric value that can be rounded up to a whole number? It again uses the is_integer() to check if that's possible. If it is, then it calls the integer() validator to coerce value to a whole number.

If it can't coerce value to a whole number? It raises a ValueError.

Confident Approach: try ... except

Sometimes, we'll have more confidence in the values that we can expect to work with. This means that we might expect value to generally have the kind of data we need to work with. This means that situations where value doesn't contain what we need will truly be exceptional situations, and can be handled accordingly.

In this situation, a good approach is to apply the following logic:

#. Skip a checker entirely, and just wrap the validator in a try...except block.

We tend to use this in situations where we're working with data that our own code has produced (meaning we know - generally - what we can expect, unless something went seriously wrong).

Here's an example:

.. code-block:: python

from validator_collection import validators, errors

def some_function(value): try: email_address = validators.email(value, allow_empty = False) except errors.InvalidEmailError as error: # handle the error here except ValueError as error: # handle other ValueErrors here

  # do something with your new email address value

  return email_address

email = some_function('[email protected]')

This will return the email address.

email = some_function('not-a-valid-email')

This will raise a ValueError that some_function() will handle.

email = some_function(None)

This will raise a ValueError that some_function() will handle.

So what's this code do? It's pretty straightforward. some_function() expects to receive a value that contains an email address. We expect that value will typically be an email address, and not something weird (like a number or something). So we just try the validator - and if validation fails, we handle the error appropriately.



Questions and Issues


You can ask questions and report issues on the project's Github Issues Page <https://github.com/insightindustry/validator-collection/issues>_


Contributing


We welcome contributions and pull requests! For more information, please see the Contributor Guide <http://validator-collection.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html>_.

And thanks to all those who have contributed <https://github.com/insightindustry/validator-collection/graphs/contributors>_!


Testing


We use TravisCI <http://travisci.org>_ for our build automation and ReadTheDocs <https://readthedocs.org>_ for our documentation.

Detailed information about our test suite and how to run tests locally can be found in our Testing Reference <http://validator-collection.readthedocs.io/en/latest/testing.html>_.


License


The Validator Collection is made available on a MIT License.

Note that the project description data, including the texts, logos, images, and/or trademarks, for each open source project belongs to its rightful owner. If you wish to add or remove any projects, please contact us at [email protected].