All Projects → dazinator → Dotnettency

dazinator / Dotnettency

Licence: mit
Mutlitenancy for dotnet applications

Projects that are alternatives of or similar to Dotnettency

PersianDataAnnotations
PersianDataAnnotations is ASP.NET Core MVC & ASP.NET MVC Custom Localization DataAnnotations (Localized MVC Errors) for Persian(Farsi) language - فارسی سازی خطاهای اعتبارسنجی توکار ام.وی.سی. و کور.ام.وی.سی. برای نمایش اعتبار سنجی سمت کلاینت
Stars: ✭ 38 (-62%)
Mutual labels:  mvc, aspnetcore
AspNetCore-ReCAPTCHAv3
reCAPTCHA v3 Usage in Asp.Net Core MVC
Stars: ✭ 17 (-83%)
Mutual labels:  mvc, aspnetcore
MvcSimplePager
Simple,lightweight,easy to expand pager for asp.net mvc and asp.net core,针对asp.net mvc 和 asp.net core 设计的通用、扩展性良好的轻量级分页扩展
Stars: ✭ 13 (-87%)
Mutual labels:  mvc, aspnetcore
MsCoreOne
MsCoreOne is a simple Ecommerce with using many technologies such as .NET 5, Entity Framework Core 5, React 16.13 with modern Clean Architecture, Domain-Driven Design, CQRS, SOLID, Identity Server 4, Blazor. It will focus on resolving the problems always see in the process to develop projects.
Stars: ✭ 77 (-23%)
Mutual labels:  mvc, aspnetcore
Danvic.psu
This is my graduation project of dotnet core version
Stars: ✭ 46 (-54%)
Mutual labels:  aspnetcore, mvc
XAF Security E4908
This repository contains examples for Role-based Access Control, Permission Management, and OData / Web / REST API Services for Entity Framework and XPO ORM
Stars: ✭ 47 (-53%)
Mutual labels:  mvc, aspnetcore
DNTCommon.Web.Core
DNTCommon.Web.Core provides common scenarios' solutions for ASP.NET Core 3.x applications.
Stars: ✭ 117 (+17%)
Mutual labels:  mvc, aspnetcore
Organizingaspnetcore
Offers several different ways to organize content in ASP.NET Core MVC and Razor Pages projects.
Stars: ✭ 183 (+83%)
Mutual labels:  aspnetcore, mvc
Practical Clean Ddd
A simplified and effortless approach to get started with Domain-driven Design, Clean Architecture, CQRS, and Microservices patterns
Stars: ✭ 28 (-72%)
Mutual labels:  aspnetcore, containers
Wtm
Use WTM to write .netcore app fast !!!
Stars: ✭ 3,403 (+3303%)
Mutual labels:  aspnetcore, mvc
Sarek
Detect germline or somatic variants from normal or tumour/normal whole-genome or targeted sequencing
Stars: ✭ 124 (+24%)
Mutual labels:  pipeline, containers
Aspnetcorewindowsauth
Local and Windows Authentication, ASP.NET Core MVC, IdentityServer4
Stars: ✭ 87 (-13%)
Mutual labels:  aspnetcore, mvc
Lastbackend
System for containerized apps management. From build to scaling.
Stars: ✭ 1,536 (+1436%)
Mutual labels:  pipeline, containers
MADE.NET
MADE.NET is a home to all of those bits of code that you know you'll reuse in another project. Making app development easier with .NET.
Stars: ✭ 75 (-25%)
Mutual labels:  mvc, aspnetcore
Aspnetcorelocalization
Localization.SqlLocalizer & ASP.NET Core MVC Localization Examples
Stars: ✭ 183 (+83%)
Mutual labels:  aspnetcore, mvc
AspNetCoreMvcAngular
ASP.NET Core MVC with angular in MVC View OpenID Connect Hybrid Flow
Stars: ✭ 54 (-46%)
Mutual labels:  mvc, aspnetcore
Elmahcore
ELMAH for Net.Standard and Net.Core
Stars: ✭ 127 (+27%)
Mutual labels:  aspnetcore, mvc
Identityserver4aspnetcoreidentitytemplate
An ASP.NET Core 3.1 IdentityServer4 Identity Bootstrap 4 template with localization
Stars: ✭ 262 (+162%)
Mutual labels:  aspnetcore, mvc
Yishaadmin
基于 .NET Core MVC 的权限管理系统,代码易读易懂、界面简洁美观。演示版 http://106.14.124.170/admin
Stars: ✭ 1,186 (+1086%)
Mutual labels:  aspnetcore, mvc
Docker Series
Docker Series about containerizing ASP.NET Core app with MySQL..
Stars: ✭ 88 (-12%)
Mutual labels:  aspnetcore, containers

c# Dotnettency Dotnettency is a library that provides features to enable Multi-Tenant applications using either:

  • ASP.NET Core
  • OWIN
Branch AppVeyor DevOps
Master Build status
Develop Build status Build Status
Package Stable Pre-release
Dotnettency Core Dotnettency Dotnettency
AspNetCore AspNetCore AspNetCore
Owin Owin Owin
EF Core EF Core EF Core
Tenant File System Tenant FileSystem Tenant FileSystem
Autofac Autofac Autofac
StructureMap StructureMap StructureMap
Configuration Dotnettency Dotnettency

Inspired by saaskit

Resources

Features

Tenant resolution

You can define how you want to identify the current tenant, i.e using a url scheme, cookie, or any of your custom logic. You can then access the current tenant through dependency injection in your app.

Tenant Middleware Pipelines

In your web application (OWIN or ASP.NET Core), when the web server recieves a request, it typically runs it through a single "middleware pipeline". Dotnettency allows you to have a lazily initialised "Tenant Middleware Pipeline" created for each distinct tenant. In the tenant specific middleware pipeline, you can choose to include middleware conditionally based on current tenant information. For example, for one tenant, you may use Facebook Authentication middleware, where as for another you might not want that middleware enabled.

Tenant Containers / Services

In ASP.NET Core applications (Dotnettency also allows you to achieve this in OWIN applications even though OWIN doesn't cater for this pattern out of the box), you configure a global set of services on startup for dependency injection purposes. At the start of a request, ASP.NET Core middleware creates a scoped version of those services to satisfy that request. Dotnettency goes a step further, by allowing you to register services for each specific tenant. Dotnettency middleware then provides an IServiceProvider scoped to the request for the current tenant. This means services that are typically injected into your classes during a request can now be tenant specific. This is useful if, for example, you want one tenant to use a different IPaymentProvider etc from another based on tenant settings etc.

Tenant File System

Notes: For more in depth details on what Per Tenant File System is, see the README on the sample.

Allows you to configure an IFileProvider that returns files from a virtual directory build for the current tenant. For example, tenant foo might want to access a file /bar.txt which exists for them, but when tenant bar tries to access /bar.txt it doesn't exist for them - because each tenant has it's own distinct virtual directory. Tenant virtual directories can overlap by sharing access to common directories / files.

Tenant Injection

Once configured in startup.cs you can resolve the current tenant in any one of the following ways:

  • Inject TTenant directly (may block whilst resolving current tenant).
  • Inject Task<TTenant> - Allows you to await the current Tenant (so non blocking). Task<TTenant> is convenient.
  • Inject ITenantAccessor<TTenant>. This is similar to injecting Task<Tenant> in that it provides lazy access the current tenant in a non blocking way. For convenience it's now easier to just inject Task<Tenant> instead, unless you want a more descriptive API.

Tenant Restart (New in v2.0.0)

You can Restart a tenant. This does not stop the web application, or interfere with other tenants. When you trigger a Restart of a tenant, it means the current tenants TenantShell (and all state, such as Services, MiddlewarePipeline etc) are disposed of. Once the Restart has finished, it means the next http request to that tenant will result in the tenant intialising again from scratch. This is useful for example, if you register services or middleware based on some settings, and you want to allow the settings to be changed for the tenant and therefore services middleware pipeline to be rebuilt based on latest config. It is also useful if you have a plugin based architecture, and you want to allow tenants to install plugins whilst the system is running.

  • Tenant Container will be re-built (if you are usijng tenant services the method you use to register services for the current tenant will be re-rexecuted.)
  • Tenant Middleware Pipeline will be re-built (if you are using tenant middleware pipeline, it will be rebuilt - you'll have a chance to include additional middlewares etc.)

For sample usage, see the Sample.AspNetCore30.RazorPages sample in this solution, in partcular the Pages/Gicrosoft/Index.cshtml page.

Injext ITenantShellRestarter<Tenant> and invoke the Restart() method:

    public class IndexModel : PageModel
    {

        public bool IsRestarted { get; set; }

        public void OnGet()
        {

        }

        public async Task OnPost([FromServices]ITenantShellRestarter<Tenant> restarter)
        {
            await restarter.Restart();
            IsRestarted = true;
            this.Redirect("/");
        }
    }

and corresponding razor page:


@page
@using Sample.Pages.T1
@model IndexModel
@{
    ViewData["Title"] = "Home page";
}

<div class="text-center">
    <h1>Tenant Gicrosoft Razor Pages!</h1>

    <form method="post">
        @{
            if ([email protected])
            {
                <button asp-page="Index">Restart Tenant</button>
            }
            else
            {
                <button disabled asp-page="Index">Restart Tenant</button>
                <p>Tenant has been restarted, the next request will result in Tenant Container being rebuilt, and tenant middleware pipeline being re-initialised.</p>
            }
        }

    </form>
</div>

Tenant Shell Injection

The TenantShell stores the context for a Tenant, such as it's Container and it's MiddlewarePipeline. It's stored in a cache, and is evicted if the tenant is Restarted. You probably won't need to use it directly, but if you want you can do so.

  • Inject ITenantShellAccessor<TTenant> to access the TenantShell for the current tenant.
  • Extensions (such as Middleware, or Container) - store things for the tenant in it's concurrent property bag. You can get at these properties if you know the keys.
  • You can also register callbacks that will be invoked when the TenantShell is disposed of - this happens when the tenant is restarted for example.

Another way to register code that will run when the tenant is restarted, is to use TenantServices - add a disposable singleton service the tenant's container. When the tenant is disposed of, it's container will be disposed of, and your disposable service will be disposed of - depending upon your needs this hook might suffice.

Tenant IConfiguration (New in v2.1.0)

ASP.NET Core hosting model allows you to build an IConfiguration for your application settings. Dotnettency takes this further, by allowing each tenant to have it's own IConfiguration lazily constructed when the tenant is initialised (first request to the tenant). You can access the current tenant's IConfiguration by injecting Task<IConfiguration> into your Controllers. The snippet below shows how to configure tenant specific configuration, notice how it uses the current tenant's name to find the JSON file:

 .ConfigureTenantConfiguration((a) =>
                        {
                            var tenantConfig = new ConfigurationBuilder();
                            tenantConfig.AddJsonFile(Environment.ContentRootFileProvider, $"/appsettings.{a.Tenant?.Name}.json", true, true);
                            return tenantConfig;
                        })
						

You can now inject Task<IConfiguration> into your controllers etc, and await the result to obtain the tenants IConfiguration. Note: if you inject IConfiguration rather than Task<IConfiguration> you will get the usual application wide IConfiguration like normal (currently).

You can access the Tenant's `IConfiguration' when building the Tenant's middleware pipeline, or Container - this is designed such that you could use tenant specific configuration to decide how to configure that tenants middleware or services.

Tenant Shell Items

Tenant Shell Items are special kind of item that have a lifetime tied to the current tenant, and are stored in the tenant's TenantShell. They are:

  1. Lazily initialised on first access, per tenant.
  2. Stored in the tenant's TenantShell for the lifetime of that tenant.
  3. If the tenant is restarted, the value is cleared from the tenant's shell, and lazily re-initialised on next access again.
  4. If your TItem implements IDisposable it will be disposed of when the it is removed from the TenantShell (typically on a tenant restart) accessed asynchronously. Not currently implemented.
  5. It will be registered for DI as Task<TItem> so you can inject it and then await the Task to get the value. The await is necessary as the value will be asynchronously created only on first access for that tenant. On subsequent accesses, the same cached task (already completed) is used to return the value immediately.

You can register a tenant shell item during dotnettency fluent configuration like:

             services.AddMultiTenancy<Tenant>((builder) =>
             {
                 builder.IdentifyTenantsWithRequestAuthorityUri()
                         // .. shortened for brevity
                        .ConfigureTenantShellItem((tenantInfo) =>
                        {
                            return new ExampleShellItem { TenantName = tenantInfo.Tenant?.Name };
                        })

You can now access this through DI:


public class MyController
{
      public MyController(Task<ExampleShellItem> shellItem)
	  {
	  
	  }

}

Note: If you don't like injecting Task<T> you can also inject ITenantShellItemAccessor<TTenant, TItem> and use that to get access to the shell item

You can also access the shell item during most fluent configuration of a tenant, for example most fluent configuration methods expose a context object with a GetShellItemAsync extension method:

 var exampleShellItem = await context.GetShellItemAsync<ExampleShellItem>();

Named Shell Items?

Suppose you want to register multiple of your Shell Item instances, with different names. You can use the ConfigureNamedTenantShellItems instead.

             services.AddMultiTenancy<Tenant>((builder) =>
             {
                 builder.IdentifyTenantsWithRequestAuthorityUri()
                         // .. shortened for brevity
                         .ConfigureNamedTenantShellItems<Tenant, ExampleShellItem>((b) =>
                         {
                             b.Add("red", (c) => new ExampleShellItem(c.Tenant?.Name ?? "NULL TENANT") { Colour = "red" });
                             b.Add("blue", (c) => new ExampleShellItem(c.Tenant?.Name ?? "NULL TENANT") { Colour = "blue" });
                         });


To access a named shell item through DI, rather than injecting Task<T>, you can inject Func<string,Task`:

public class MyController
{
      private readonly Func<string, Task<T>> _namedShellItemFactory
     
	  public MyController(Func<string, Task<T>> namedShellItemFactory)
	  {
	     _namedShellItemFactory = namedShellItemFactory;
	  }

	  public async Task<T> GetRedItem()
	  {
	      return await _namedShellItemFactory("red");
	  }

}

Or during fluent configuration of the tenant, for exmaple whilst configuring the tenant's middleware pipeline or services:

 var redShellItem = await context.GetShellItemAsync<ExampleShellItem>("red");

Tenant Mapping (New in v3.0)

There now exists a newer API to help you get up and running more quickly. In most cases you just want to map some value during an incoming request (using some value current httpcontext like Request.Hostname etc.) to a unique identifier, that can then be used to establish the correct context for the current tenant.

So this is the new way to configure dotnettency on startup (the old api's still exist and work):

            ServiceCollection services = new ServiceCollection();
            services.AddOptions();
            services.AddLogging();
            services.AddMultiTenancy<Tenant>((builder) =>
            {
                builder.AddAspNetCore()                      
                       .IdentifyFromHttpContext<int>((m) =>
                       {
                           m.MapRequestHost() // you can optionally use lambda here to select from any available value in httpcontext
                            .WithMapping((tenants) =>
                            {
                                tenants.Add(1, "*.foo.com", "*.foo.uk");
                                tenants.Add(2, "t2.bar.com", "t1.foo.uk");
                            })
                            .UsingDotNetGlobPatternMatching(); // add the Dotnettency.DotNetGlob package for this extension method.
                            .Initialise((key) =>
                            {
                                // e.g return Tenant info that you need for the mapped key.
                                if (key == 1)
                                {
                                    var tenant = new Tenant() { Id = key, Name = "Test Tenant" };
                                    return Task.FromResult(tenant);
                                }
                                return null; // we somehow mapped an invalid key - return null.
                            });                            
                      });                       
            });

There are various options available for these API's.

You can also put your mapping in a config file, rather than using .WithMapping():

            ServiceCollection services = new ServiceCollection();
            services.AddOptions();
            services.AddLogging();
            services.AddMultiTenancy<Tenant>((builder) =>
            {
                builder.AddAspNetCore()                      
                       .IdentifyFromHttpContext<int>((m) =>
                       {
                           m.MapRequestHost()                            
                            .UsingDotNetGlobPatternMatching(); // add the Dotnettency.DotNetGlob package for this extension method.
                            .Initialise((key) =>
                            {
                                // e.g load tenant info for mapped key.
                                if (key == 1)
                                {
                                    var tenant = new Tenant() { Id = key, Name = "Test Tenant" };
                                    return Task.FromResult(tenant);
                                }
                                return Task.FromResult<Tenant>(null); // we must have mapped an invalid key.
                            });                            
                      });                       
            });

            // Let's put our mapping in configuration - then it will reload if we make config changes!
            IConfigurationSection configSection = Configuration.GetSection("Tenants");
            services.Configure<TenantMappingOptions<int>>(configSection);

Then in your appsettings.json:


{
  "Mappings": [
    {
      "Key": 1,
      "Patterns": [ "*.foo.com", "*.foo.org" ]
    },
    {
      "Key": 2,
      "Patterns": [ "*.bar.com" ]
    }
  ]
}

The call to .UsingDotNetGlobPatternMatching(); allows you to use the glob pattern syntax specified here: https://github.com/dazinator/DotNet.Glob#patterns

Conditionally enabled mappings

You might want to put in place a mapping that is conditionally enabled based on some application check / state. For example, whilst your application is in "Setup Mode", you might want all requests mapped to a special -1 tenant key, which will indicate the system setup tenant shell. Then you can initialise that shell just for the system setup experience / api's etc.

You can do this like so:

  
     var isSetupComplete = false;

     .IdentifyFromHttpContext<int>((m) =>
     {
         m.MapRequestHost()
         .WithMapping((a) =>
         {
             a.Add(-1, new string[] { "**" }, "IsSetupComplete", false);
             a.Add(1, new string[] { "*.foo.com", "*.foo.uk" });
         })
         .RegisterConditions((c) =>
         {
             c.Add("IsSetupComplete", (sp) =>
             {
                 return isSetupComplete; // function called to evaluate this condition when matching a request.
             });
         })          
         .Initialise((key) =>
         {
              if(key == -1)
              {
                var tenant = new Tenant() { Id = key, Name = "System Setup Tenant" };
			  }
              else
              {
                var tenant = new Tenant() { Id = key, Name = "Foo" };
                return Task.FromResult(tenant);
			  }             
          });
     });        

Of if you prefer config, remove the WithMapping() call, and place this in your appsettings.json instead:

{
  "Mappings": [
    {
      "Key": -1,
      "Patterns": [ "**" ],
      "Condition": {
        "Name": "IsSetupComplete",
        "RequiredValue": false
      }
    },
    {
      "Key": 1,
      "Patterns": [ "t1.foo.com", "*.foo.uk" ]      
    }
  ]
}


Now whilst isSetupComplete is false the first mapping will be enabled, which will match all requests, and map to a tenant key of -1. When you initialise the tenant, like load its services, and middelware etc, you can only add services / middleware required for your system setup experience. Once system setup is complete, your IsSsytemSetup condition function should start returning true which will then disable this first mapping. From that point onwards, request mapping will then proceed to evaluate the rest of the mappings to resolve a reuqest to a tenant key - in this case t1.foo.com and any subdomain of foo.uk will resolve to tenant key 1.

Catch-all mapping

You might want to ensure that you catch any requests not mapped to other tenants, with a catch all mapping that you can map to a special key to initialise a "default" or "welcome page" tenant. You'd just ensure you have this mapping at the bottom of your mappings list. As long as no other mapping above it maps to another key, then this is essentially the fallback key.


{
  "Mappings": [
    {
      "Key": -2,
      "Patterns": [ "**" ]
    }
  ]
}

As you on-board new tenants, you'd update these mappings to add the url mapping for each tenant, above that catch-all mapping:

{
  "Mappings": [
    {
      "Key": 1,
      "Patterns": [ "*.foo.com" ]
    },
    {
      "Key": -2,
      "Patterns": [ "**" ]
    }
  ]
}

Now any request that comes in for a tenant not set up will be caught and mapped to -2 key, and you can use that when initialising that tenant to only add the services / middleware etc required to present your welcome page.

Having trouble updating the Json file? Yes System.Text.Json isn't currently the best - back to Newtonsoft?

Notes

Serilog

When configuring serilog, there is an issue to be aware of Instead of calling UseSerilog on the HostBuilder, you need to do this:

  webhostBuilder.ConfigureLogging((logging) =>
                {
                    logging.ClearProviders();// clears microsoft providers registered by default like console.
                    logging.AddSerilog(Logger);
                });
Note that the project description data, including the texts, logos, images, and/or trademarks, for each open source project belongs to its rightful owner. If you wish to add or remove any projects, please contact us at [email protected].