lxdock / Lxdock
Programming Languages
Projects that are alternatives of or similar to Lxdock
LXDock
.. image:: https://readthedocs.org/projects/lxdock/badge/?style=flat-square&version=stable :target: https://lxdock.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ :alt: Documentation
.. image:: https://img.shields.io/pypi/l/lxdock.svg?style=flat-square :target: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/lxdock/ :alt: License
.. image:: https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/lxdock.svg?style=flat-square :target: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/lxdock/ :alt: Latest Version
.. image:: https://img.shields.io/travis/lxdock/lxdock.svg?style=flat-square :target: https://travis-ci.org/lxdock/lxdock :alt: Build status
.. image:: https://img.shields.io/codecov/c/github/lxdock/lxdock.svg?style=flat-square :target: https://codecov.io/github/lxdock/lxdock :alt: Codecov status
|
LXDock is a wrapper around LXD_ that allows developers to orchestrate their development environments using a workflow similar to Vagrant.
.. contents:: Table of Contents :local:
Status: New Maintainers
As of LXDock v0.4.1 the two creators of LXDock stopped using it, however the project has several new maintainers now.
See: issue #106 <https://github.com/lxdock/lxdock/issues/106>
_
The Travis CI tests are working again as we have switched to the Snap version of LXD since the PPA is no longer maintained. This is great news as it has allowed a number of outstanding PR's to be merged, with more to come.
There is also a Vagrantfile included for running the tests locally.
The next release will be v0.5.0, but no release date has been set at this point.
More to come...
Why use LXDock?
It's fast. LXDock is much much faster than a typical Vagrant + Virtualbox setup.
Multi-arch. Vagrant has been designed with Virtualbox and x86 in mind. Even if you use
alternative providers, you're going to have to jump through inelegant hoops to have your
Vagrantfile
work on x86 and arm (for example) at the same time because the very concept of a
Vagrant box is arch-specific.
Simpler. When working with containers, much of the complexity of Vagrant becomes useless. Why
the need for special "vagrant-prepared" boxes when lxc exec
is available? It's much simpler to
use whatever images are provided directly by lxd. By removing the need to manage boxes, lxdock
suddenly becomes much simpler (a simple wrapper around lxd, really).
Documentation
Online browsable documentation is available at https://lxdock.readthedocs.io.
Head over to the documentation for all the details on how to set up LXDock and how to start using containers in your project!
Requirements
LXD_, Python 3.4+. Please refer to the requirements_ section of the documentation for a full list of dependencies.
.. _LXD: https://www.ubuntu.com/cloud/lxd .. _requirements: https://lxdock.readthedocs.io/en/stable/getting_started.html#requirements
Communication
You can join the #lxdock
channel on irc.freenode.net to get help and ask questions related to
the development of LXDock.
Current Maintainers
Rob van der Linde (@robvdl <https://github.com/robvdl>
),
Norman Kabir (@nkabir <https://github.com/nkabir>
)
Original Authors
Virgil Dupras (@hsoft <https://github.com/hsoft>
), Morgan Aubert
(@ellmetha <https://github.com/ellmetha>
) and contributors_.
.. _contributors: https://github.com/lxdock/lxdock/contributors
License
GPLv3. See LICENSE
for more details.