All Projects → mswjs → Msw

mswjs / Msw

Licence: mit
Seamless REST/GraphQL API mocking library for browser and Node.js.

Programming Languages

typescript
32286 projects
javascript
184084 projects - #8 most used programming language

Projects that are alternatives of or similar to Msw

mswjs.io
Official website and documentation for the Mock Service Worker library.
Stars: ✭ 77 (-99.02%)
Mutual labels:  mock, service-worker, mocking, msw
mock-inspect
Mocks network requests and allows you to make assertions about how these requests happened. Supports auto-mocking of graphQL requests given a valid schema.
Stars: ✭ 19 (-99.76%)
Mutual labels:  mocking, mocking-framework, mocking-library
Mockito
Most popular Mocking framework for unit tests written in Java
Stars: ✭ 12,453 (+59.04%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking, mocking-framework
Kakapo.js
🐦 Next generation mocking framework in Javascript
Stars: ✭ 535 (-93.17%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking, mocking-framework
umock-c
A pure C mocking library
Stars: ✭ 29 (-99.63%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking, mocking-framework
Fake Xrm Easy
The testing framework for Dynamics CRM and Dynamics 365 which runs on an In-Memory context and deals with mocks or fakes for you
Stars: ✭ 216 (-97.24%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking, mocking-framework
Mockolo
Efficient Mock Generator for Swift
Stars: ✭ 327 (-95.82%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking, mocking-framework
Parrot
✨ Scenario-based HTTP mocking
Stars: ✭ 109 (-98.61%)
Mutual labels:  devtools, mock, mocking
chrome-extension-mocker
The most convenient tool to mock requests for axios, with built-in Chrome extension support.
Stars: ✭ 37 (-99.53%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking, mocking-library
Mimic
Seamless client side mocking
Stars: ✭ 380 (-95.15%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking, mocking-framework
elixir mock
Creates clean, concurrent, inspectable mocks from elixir modules
Stars: ✭ 21 (-99.73%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking
Retromock
Java library for mocking responses in a Retrofit service.
Stars: ✭ 48 (-99.39%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking
msw-storybook-addon
Mock API requests in Storybook with Mock Service Worker.
Stars: ✭ 168 (-97.85%)
Mutual labels:  mock, msw
mountebank-api-php
Working with mountebank api it's easy!
Stars: ✭ 17 (-99.78%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking
ineeda
Mocking library for TypeScript and JavaScript using Proxies!
Stars: ✭ 53 (-99.32%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking
better-mock
Forked from Mockjs, Generate random data & Intercept ajax request. Support miniprogram.
Stars: ✭ 140 (-98.21%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking
automock
A library for testing classes with auto mocking capabilities using jest-mock-extended
Stars: ✭ 26 (-99.67%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking
amoss
Amoss - Apex Mock Objects, Spies and Stubs - A Simple Mocking framework for Apex (Salesforce)
Stars: ✭ 55 (-99.3%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking-framework
Hippolyte
HTTP Stubbing in Swift
Stars: ✭ 109 (-98.61%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking
Firebase Mock
Firebase mock library for writing unit tests
Stars: ✭ 319 (-95.93%)
Mutual labels:  mock, mocking

Mock Service Worker logo

Mock Service Worker

Mock Service Worker (MSW) is an API mocking library for browser and Node.js.

Package version Build status Downloads per month Discord server


Features

  • Seamless. A dedicated layer of requests interception at your disposal. Keep your application's code and tests unaware of whether something is mocked or not.
  • Deviation-free. Request the same production resources and test the actual behavior of your app. Augment an existing API, or design it as you go, when there is none.
  • Familiar & Powerful. Use Express-like routing syntax to capture outgoing requests. Use parameters, wildcards, and regular expressions to match requests, and respond with necessary status codes, headers, cookies, delays, or completely custom resolvers.

"I found MSW and was thrilled that not only could I still see the mocked responses in my DevTools, but that the mocks didn't have to be written in a Service Worker and could instead live alongside the rest of my app. This made it silly easy to adopt. The fact that I can use it for testing as well makes MSW a huge productivity booster."

Kent C. Dodds

Documentation

Examples

Browser

How does it work?

Browser usage is what sets Mock Service Worker apart from other tools. Utilizing the Service Worker API, which can intercept requests for the purpose of caching, Mock Service Worker responds to captured requests with your mock definition on the network level. This way your application knows nothing about the mocking.

Watch a 30 seconds explanation on how Mock Service Worker works in a browser:

What is Mock Service Worker?

How is it different?

  • Intercepts requests on the network level, not the application level.
  • If you think of your application as a box, Mock Service Worker lives in its own box next to yours, instead of opening and altering it for the purpose of mocking.
  • Agnostic of request-issuing libraries, so you can use it with fetch, axios, react-query, you-name-it.
  • The same mock definition can be reused for unit, integration, E2E testing, and debugging.

Usage example

// src/mocks.js
// 1. Import mocking utils.
import { setupWorker, rest } from 'msw'

// 2. Define request handlers and response resolvers.
const worker = setupWorker(
  rest.get('https://github.com/octocat', (req, res, ctx) => {
    return res(
      ctx.delay(1500),
      ctx.status(202, 'Mocked status'),
      ctx.json({
        message: 'Mocked response JSON body',
      }),
    )
  }),
)

// 3. Start the Service Worker.
worker.start()

Performing a GET https://github.com/octocat request in your application will result into a mocked response that you can inspect in your browser's "Network" tab:

Chrome DevTools Network screenshot with the request mocked

Tip: Did you know that although Service Worker runs in a separate thread, your mock definition executes on the client-side? That way you can use the same languages (i.e. TypeScript), third-party libraries, and internal logic in mocks.

Node

How does it work?

Although Service Worker is a browser-specific API, this library allows reusing of the same mock definition to have API mocking in Node.js through augmenting native request issuing modules.

How is it different?

  • Prevents from stubbing fetch/axios/etc. as a part of your test, allowing you to treat API mocking as a pre-requisite and focus on what actually matters during testing.
  • The same mock definition you use for local development can be reused for testing.

Usage example

Here's an example of an actual integration test in Jest that uses React Testing Library and Mock Service Worker:

// test/LoginForm.test.js
import '@testing-library/jest-dom'
import React from 'react'
import { rest } from 'msw'
import { setupServer } from 'msw/node'
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react'
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
import Login from '../src/components/Login'

const server = setupServer(
  rest.post('/login', (req, res, ctx) => {
    // Respond with a mocked user token that gets persisted
    // in the `sessionStorage` by the `Login` component.
    return res(ctx.json({ token: 'mocked_user_token' }))
  }),
)

// Enable API mocking before tests.
beforeAll(() => server.listen())

// Reset any runtime request handlers we may add during the tests.
afterEach(() => server.resetHandlers())

// Disable API mocking after the tests are done.
afterAll(() => server.close())

test('allows the user to log in', async () => {
  render(<Login />)
  userEvent.type(
    screen.getByRole('textbox', { name: /username/i }),
    'john.maverick',
  )
  userEvent.type(
    screen.getByRole('textbox', { name: /password/i }),
    'super-secret',
  )
  userEvent.click(screen.getByText(/submit/i))
  const alert = await screen.findByRole('alert')

  // Assert successful login state
  expect(alert).toHaveTextContent(/welcome/i)
  expect(window.sessionStorage.getItem('token')).toEqual(fakeUserResponse.token)
})

test('handles login exception', () => {
  server.use(
    rest.post('/login', (req, res, ctx) => {
      // Respond with "500 Internal Server Error" status for this test.
      return res(
        ctx.status(500),
        ctx.json({ message: 'Internal Server Error' }),
      )
    }),
  )

  render(<Login />)
  userEvent.type(
    screen.getByRole('textbox', { name: /username/i }),
    'john.maverick',
  )
  userEvent.type(
    screen.getByRole('textbox', { name: /password/i }),
    'super-secret',
  )
  userEvent.click(screen.getByText(/submit/i))

  // Assert meaningful error message shown to the user
  expect(alert).toHaveTextContent(/sorry, something went wrong/i)
  expect(window.sessionStorage.getItem('token')).toBeNull()
})

Tip: Did you know that although the API is called setupServer, there are no actual servers involved? The name is chosen for familiarity, and the API is designed to resemble operating with an actual server.

Awards & Mentions


Open Source Awards 2020

Note that the project description data, including the texts, logos, images, and/or trademarks, for each open source project belongs to its rightful owner. If you wish to add or remove any projects, please contact us at [email protected].