All Projects → epolevikov → Asgan

epolevikov / Asgan

Licence: MIT license
A tool for analysis of assembly graphs

Programming Languages

python
139335 projects - #7 most used programming language

Projects that are alternatives of or similar to Asgan

PCG
𝙋𝙝𝙮𝙡𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙘 𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙥𝙝 ⸺ Haskell program and libraries for general phylogenetic graph search
Stars: ✭ 20 (-23.08%)
Mutual labels:  comparative-genomics
CAMSA
CAMSA: a tool for Comparative Analysis and Merging of Scaffold Assemblies
Stars: ✭ 18 (-30.77%)
Mutual labels:  comparative-genomics
mcscan
Command-line program to wrap dagchainer and combine pairwise results into multi-alignments in column format
Stars: ✭ 18 (-30.77%)
Mutual labels:  comparative-genomics
ensembl-compara
The Ensembl Compara Perl API and SQL schema
Stars: ✭ 43 (+65.38%)
Mutual labels:  comparative-genomics
gcv
Federating genomes with love (and synteny derived from functional annotations)
Stars: ✭ 22 (-15.38%)
Mutual labels:  comparative-genomics
recentrifuge
Recentrifuge: robust comparative analysis and contamination removal for metagenomics
Stars: ✭ 79 (+203.85%)
Mutual labels:  comparative-genomics
GraphBin
GraphBin: Refined binning of metagenomic contigs using assembly graphs
Stars: ✭ 35 (+34.62%)
Mutual labels:  assembly-graph
cqmetrics
C Quality Metrics
Stars: ✭ 50 (+92.31%)
Mutual labels:  quality-metrics
MRQy
MRQy is a quality assurance and checking tool for quantitative assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data.
Stars: ✭ 58 (+123.08%)
Mutual labels:  quality-metrics
PTXQC
A Quality Control (QC) pipeline for Proteomics (PTX) results generated by MaxQuant
Stars: ✭ 34 (+30.77%)
Mutual labels:  quality-metrics

Asgan – Assembly Graphs Analyzer – is a tool for analysis of assembly graphs. The tool takes two assembly graphs in the GFA format as input and finds the minimum set of homologous sequences (synteny paths) shared between the graphs. As output, Asgan produces various statistics and a visualization of the found paths.

Installation

git clone --recurse-submodules https://github.com/epolevikov/Asgan
make -C Asgan/lib/minimap2

Usage example

The test folder contains two bacterial assembly from the NCTC collection produced by Flye and Canu assemblers. To run Asgan for the datasets, use the command below:

cd Asgan
python -m asgan \
    --input-query=test/flye-nctc9016.gfa \
    --input-target=test/canu-nctc9016.gfa \
    --out-dir=flye-vs-canu

After analysis is finished, the output directory will contain the following files:

  • adjacency_graph_{query, target}.gv – a visualization of synteny paths.
  • synteny_paths.txt – synteny paths in the format of an alignment.
  • stats.txt – various statistics for the graphs.

Visualization

Here is how the visualization for the test dataset looks like:

The graph built by Canu consists of two separated sequences. One of them represents a forward (+1, +2, +3, +4) strand, the other corresponds to a reverse complement (-4, -3, -2, -1) strand of a bacterial chromosome. The graph built by Flye consists of one connected component, where two complementary strands are merged through common unresolved repeats. Although the structures of the graphs are different, they share one synteny path that corresponds to a bacterial chromosome.

Synteny paths

A file named synteny_paths.txt contains the found synteny paths in the format of an alignment. For the test dataset, the file looks like this:

+1      contig_8+       5'078'954       56'910          389'537         contig_2-       425'024         47'878          378'220     
        contig_8+       5'078'954       389'537         451'517         contig_7+       16'794          0               16'794      
+2      contig_8+       5'078'954       451'517         662'367         contig_6+       209'014         0               209'014     
        contig_8+       5'078'954       662'367         682'556         contig_7-       16'794          0               16'794      
+3      contig_8+       5'078'954       682'556         3'667'386       contig_1+       2'964'866       11              2'964'858   
        contig_8+       5'078'954       3'667'386       3'691'634       contig_5-       24'049          0               24'049      
+4      contig_8+       5'078'954       3'691'634       5'064'579       contig_3+       1'364'661       0               1'364'661

The first column contains the names of the alignment blocks. The rows with ids (+1, +2, +3, +4) correspond to the unique alignment blocks, while the rows with the empty block title represent repeats. The second column corresponds to the sequences of the query assembly to which the alignment blocks were mapped. The following three columns show the length of a sequence, the starting and the ending position of an alignment block accordingly. The remaining columns correspond to the sequences, lengths, and mapping positions for the alignment blocks of the target assembly.

Statistics

Here is the content of a file named stats.txt:

        Query           Target
cc      1               1           
useqs   1               4           

seqs    1               6           
tlen    5'078'954       5'004'408   
N50     5'078'954       2'964'866   
L50     1               1           

blocks  4               4           
tlen    4'901'252       4'868'864   
bcvg    0.965           0.973       
N50     2'984'830       2'964'847   
L50     1               1           

paths   1               1           
tlen    5'007'669       4'926'501   
N50     5'007'669       4'926'501   
L50     1               1

The file consists of three columns: the first one contains the titles of various statistics, the remaining two show the values of these statistics for the Query and the Target assemblies accordingly. The statistics are split into four groups. The first group contains two statistics:

  • cc – the number of connected components in an assembly graph. Only the components containing at least one alignment block are counted. Note that even if two complementary strands are separated from each other, they are assumed to represent one component. Thus, although the graph built by Canu consists of two separated strands, the number of connected components is equal to 1.
  • useqs – the number of unique sequences in an assembly graph. The number is calculated as the difference between the total number of sequences and the number of repeats. Note that only the sequences that belong to a connected component with at least one alignment block are counted. A sequence is considered to be a repeat either if its length is lower than 50k or it does not contain alignment blocks.

The following three groups start with the statistics named seqs, blocks, and paths. Below is their description:

  • seqs – the total number of sequences in an assembly graph. Only the sequences that belong to a connected component with at least one alignment block are counted.
  • blocks – the total number of alignment blocks between two assembly graphs.
  • paths – the number of synteny paths shared between the assembly graphs. The paths are obtained by merging the alignment blocks that appear in the same order both in the query and in the target graph. See our paper if you are interested in a more detailed description of the algorithm.

Important that two complement sequences (blocks, paths) are counted as one.

Each of the last three groups (seqs, blocks, paths) contains statistics named tlen (total length), N50, L50 that can be used to estimate the contiguity of the corresponding sequences. The blocks group also has a statistic named bcvg (block coverage). This number is calculated as the total length of alignment blocks divided by the total length of sequences.

Use cases

Assessing the quality of an assembly graph

When we run an assembler for a collection of reads, we expect the assembler to reconstruct each chromosome of a genome. Thus, if a genome contains N chromosomes, the ideal assembly graph would consist of N connected components each representing one chromosome. Due to repeats and errors in reads, assembly graphs often contains defects. For example, the parts of different chromosomes might be merged in one connected component. Or, one chromosome might be separated into several parts belonging to different connected components.

If you have a reference genome available, you may use Asgan to estimate how far or close your assembly graph from the ideal one. To do that, run Asgan using the assembly graph as Query and the reference as Target. The difference between the number of synteny paths and the number of chromosomes will reveal the quality of the assembly graph.

Below you can see the results of such an analysis for the assembly graph built by Flye for the C.elegans dataset. First, let's have a look at the statistics:

        Query           Target
cc      2               6           
useqs   78              6           

seqs    165             6           
tlen    98'905'858      100'272'607
N50     1'919'214       17'493'829  
L50     18              3           

blocks  80              80          
tlen    96'408'233      97'366'606  
bcvg    0.975           0.971       
N50     1'888'725       1'875'295   
L50     18              18          

paths   16              16          
tlen    97'713'780      99'613'824  
N50     8'650'665       8'851'958   
L50     4               4

The reference genome (Target) consists of six connected components (one for each chromosome), while the assembly graph (Query) has only two. This tells us that the graph contains unresolved repeats and the parts of several chromosomes are merged through them in one component. The number of common alignment blocks between the assembly graph and the reference is 80, while the number of synteny paths is 16. This means, on the one hand, that most of the alignment blocks appear in the assembly graph in the same order as in the reference indicating the correct structure of the graph. On the other hand, sixteen is greater than 6 (the expected number of common paths), which indicates that the graph contains defects.

We don't provide a visualization for the assembly graph here since its structure is complicated and it is hard to draw any conclusions just looking at it. Instead, it might be useful to see how the synteny paths traverse the reference chromosomes:

Synteny paths shared between the assembly graph a the reference are shown in different colors. You can see that one chromosome is covered by one path (shown in blue), which is the ideal case expected for each of the chromosomes. The remaining ones, however, are covered by two or more paths indicating that some parts of the graphs have defects. The nodes incident to edges with different colors correspond to the defective parts of the assembly graph.

Comparing two assembly graphs built by different assemblers

Assume that we applied Asgan for two fragmented bacterial assembly and got one synteny path for them. Thus, having two fragmented assembly, we obtained a complete one using synteny paths decomposition. At this point, one possible application of synteny paths is improving assembly quality. If two alignment blocks appear in the same order in two different assembly graphs, these blocks are likely to appear in the same order in a reference genome. In other words, a collection of synteny paths for two fragmented assembly graphs might represent more contiguous sequences comparing with the initial sequences for each of the graphs.

Comparing assemblies of different species

Asgan can be used to compare assemblies of different species. We showed that the N50 metric for synteny paths correlates with the genomic distance between species. See the paper for details.

Tuning alignment parameters

To find an alignment between two assemblies, Asgan utilizes minimap2. By default, minimap2 is used with the asm10 preset. In some cases, the preset might need to be changed. For example, if two assemblies diverge much (sequence divergence > 10%), minimap2 will not find alignment blocks between them. For highly diverged species, we recommend to use either map-pb or map-ont preset. The default preset can changed using the --minimap-preset argument.

License

Asgan is distributed under the MIT license. See the LICENSE file for details.

Publication

Evgeny Polevikov and Mikhail Kolmogorov, "Synteny Paths for Assembly Graphs Comparison", WABI 2019. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.WABI.2019.24

WABI Supplementary

https://zenodo.org/record/3198701

Note that the project description data, including the texts, logos, images, and/or trademarks, for each open source project belongs to its rightful owner. If you wish to add or remove any projects, please contact us at [email protected].